Elizabeth B. Searle '74 Athletic Center at Garrison Forest School - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | AYOTTE James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
| 2 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
| 3 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 3 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 20% | ||
| 5 | LEE Anton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
| 6 | ARZT Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 19% |
| 6 | ZHU Yiming | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% |
| 8 | FEELY Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | CHANEY Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 17% |
| 10 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | ||
| 11 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 29% |
| 12 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
| 13 | BORAN Brooks | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 5% | |
| 14 | DOAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 15 | WILKERSON Tobias | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | LIN Haley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
| 17 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 18 | GRIGGS Kaiden | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | < 1% |
| 19 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 35% | |
| 20 | PENG Yue | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 26% | |
| 21 | LAU LUCAS | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 22 | HUDSON Declan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 24 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | MEDISETTI Arjun | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | SAAD Noah | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 27 | PERI Mourya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 28 | SHI Yeyu | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | JANKOVIC Ivan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | HUANG Max | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | GATEWOOD Michael | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | GALIOTE James | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | WEI Jayden | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | YAO Ryan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 35 | MIKHAIL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | |
| 36 | KENDLER Micah | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 37 | CUTHBERTSON Dax | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 38 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 39 | DAVIS Kai | 100% | 86% | 34% | 6% | - | ||
| 40 | SALLAI Abel | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | YU Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 42 | MAXWELL Sheito | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | 1% |
| 43 | SMOTHERS Eli | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | TSEN Mason | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | SAAD Peter | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | HALE Bradley | 100% | 99% | 84% | 36% | 5% | ||
| 47 | YAO Aiden | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 48 | SMOTHERS Nathan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | CASH William Li | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 51 | SCOTTODIMARCO James | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | SACKETT Gavin | 100% | 82% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | PRABHU Srinish | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | CHONG Eden | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | KOC Dogukan | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | MILLER Balthazar | 100% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | KUBBA Sauvil | 100% | 62% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | WORMACK Anthony Jr. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 59 | KOU Steven | 100% | 34% | 3% | - | - | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.