Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MENON Maya | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 20% |
| 2 | BEAL Cameron | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 3 | LAMTAN Trinity | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 3 | KONG Hermione | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 27% |
| 5 | NARAYAN Riya | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 6 | ZHANG Claire | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 20% |
| 7 | YANG Rachel | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 8 | YANG Jackie | - | 3% | 14% | 28% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 9 | EDUSA Nayelli | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | PRAKASH Lithika | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | NAIK Annika | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 12 | KANG Hanna | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 13 | AVDEEV Katherine | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | ODIERNO Scarlett | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 15 | ZHANG Annalyn | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 16 | LEOU Eliana | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 17 | BLAIR Isadora | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 18 | TSUI Amelia | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 19 | JAIN Anika | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
| 20 | NI Isabelle | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 21 | RAPOPORT Alice Ria | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 22 | TANG Julia | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | BIVIJI Rania | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 24 | LIM Jordyn | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | GONG Shuaiyu (Helen) | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | MADDISON Emily | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | LEE Kady Hayen | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 28 | ZHANG Ellie | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 29 | BARAKH Sophia | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 30 | YIEN Emma | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LAU Clara | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | GILLIS Sophia | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KIM Colette | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 34 | CHOI Emmeline | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | CHOI Emelie | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 36 | TSE Mackenzie | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 37 | HERWADKAR Saisha | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 38 | WANG Chloe | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 39 | PAN Emilie | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | JANASHVILI Vivian | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | MURTHI Lasya | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | BOBDE Yashwini | 17% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.