Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Chelsea | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 2 | SUN Yi | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 3 | FOSS Persephone | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
| 3 | JOHN Sophia | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 30% |
| 5 | GOEL Lineysha | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 37% | 17% |
| 6 | PARK Haylie | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 7 | YOUNG Sienna | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
| 8 | YANG Selina | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 9 | DANIELS Jordanna | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 10 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 11 | PARK Gabriella | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 12 | LEE Kaitlin | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 13 | CANARAN Daphne M. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 14 | SEO Kaitlyn | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 15 | KONDE Anika | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | WILLER Anna | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | CAFAGNA Sofia | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 48% | 33% |
| 18 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | ZHENG Winona | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 28% |
| 20 | DEMRY Kylee | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | WANG Chloe | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 9% |
| 22 | KATZ Emma | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 23 | CHAU Zoey | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 35% |
| 24 | BREWSTER Ayaki | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 4% |
| 25 | YAP Anna | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 26 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 27 | HILD Anya | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
| 28 | VINBOR COSTA SANTOS Sasha | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 29 | JUN Sofia | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 30 | SHTEYMAN Simone | 5% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZHANG Zoe Muchen | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 32 | JUILLERAT Tabea | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 33 | KIM Eunjae | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 34 | DOWNES Camille | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 35 | FAZAL Sasha | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 36 | PAN Lai An | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | FREY Elise | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 38 | LEE Jiyoung | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | AVATAPALLI Sri Aadya | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 40 | BAO Amelia | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | CHEN Chloe | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 42 | PARAISO Isabella | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | GROSSMAN Ann | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | TOM Danielle | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | ONG Katherine | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 46 | ZHOU Claire | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | JOSEPH Azalée | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 48 | LIM Charlotte | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | WEI Avril | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 50 | LAMTAN Trinity | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 50 | MADDISON Erica | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | HAGLER Alice | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 53 | QUIROS Lucia | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | FENG chloe | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 55 | CAO Audrey | 11% | 35% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | MAGITSKY Giadora | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 57 | KRISHNAN Anu | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 58 | MULHERN Eleanor | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 59 | KARAVAS Lucy | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 60 | MADDISON Estelle | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | GU Allison | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | DOROBANTU Emma | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | SMITH Genevieve | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 64 | SAGER Bianca | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 65 | LIAO Amber | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 66 | LIM Isabella | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 67 | SINGH Zara | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 68 | DATLA Aanya | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 69 | MOSHAROVA Natalia | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | BROGAN Samantha | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 69 | SVIDER Axelle | 20% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | CHANG Grace | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | SRIVASTAV Vani | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 74 | WU Jing | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 75 | SAXENA Devina Shyamli | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 76 | SATHISH Sreesha | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.