Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAUL Lila | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | ||
| 2 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 3 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 42% | 14% |
| 3 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
| 5 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 6 | LEE Hannah | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 7 | HILD Nisha | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 8 | SINHA Anika | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 46% | 18% |
| 9 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 10 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 11 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 12 | KIM Marley I. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 13 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 14 | SO Catelyn | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 34% |
| 15 | WHALEN Paige C. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 15 | FESTA Carina | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 17 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 9% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% | ||
| 18 | NAYAK Indra | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 19 | FIC KAROLINA E. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | NAYAK Anika | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | NATH Trisha | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 22 | SPEARS Mya B | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% | ||
| 23 | WANG Audrey | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | DAI Olivia | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 25 | MCKEE Ainsley | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | ALTIRS Kate | 29% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 7% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | YEN Natalie | 6% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | YU Abriella R. | 7% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | FIC Isabelle K. | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | ||
| 31 | SHEN Jamie | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | KIM Sydney | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | YAN Lena | 5% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | YU Enya | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 35 | JEONG Katie | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 36 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 1% | 16% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 37 | KUMAR Shreesa | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 39 | DUBE Naomi | 8% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | PRADO-TUCKER Isabel | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | LI Sophie | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | LAMMER Sophie G. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 43 | ZHENG Annabelle | 15% | 42% | 34% | 9% | - | ||
| 44 | MESSICK Maya | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | FITZSIMONS Gabriele M. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 46 | NAYAK Esha | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.