Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | ||
| 2 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 3 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | 14% |
| 3 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 20% |
| 5 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 25% |
| 6 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 7 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 25% | |
| 8 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 18% |
| 9 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 10 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 11 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 12 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 13 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% |
| 14 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% |
| 15 | WHALEN Paige C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 15 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 17 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 100% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 2% | ||
| 18 | NAYAK Indra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 19 | FIC KAROLINA E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 21 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
| 22 | SPEARS Mya B | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 3% | ||
| 23 | WANG Audrey | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 25 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | ALTIRS Kate | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | YU Abriella R. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | FIC Isabelle K. | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | ||
| 31 | SHEN Jamie | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | KIM Sydney | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | YAN Lena | 100% | 95% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | YU Enya | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 35 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 36 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 37 | KUMAR Shreesa | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 39 | DUBE Naomi | 100% | 92% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | PRADO-TUCKER Isabel | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | LI Sophie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | LAMMER Sophie G. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 43 | ZHENG Annabelle | 100% | 85% | 44% | 9% | - | ||
| 44 | MESSICK Maya | 100% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | FITZSIMONS Gabriele M. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 46 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.