Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Anya | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% | |
| 2 | SAIFEE Sakina | - | - | - | 7% | 35% | 58% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Selene T. | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 9% | |
| 3 | WU Gloria | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 49% |
| 5 | LIN Clara | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 6 | KIM Rylie | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
| 7 | TUNG Alison | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | SHU Kayla | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% | |
| 9 | CHEN bridgette | - | - | 3% | 18% | 49% | 30% | |
| 10 | HUANG Emma | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
| 11 | PEROJO Angie | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 11% | |
| 12 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | - | - | 2% | 13% | 46% | 39% | |
| 13 | KO Alyssa | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 14 | YOON Adeline | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | FU Angela | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 16 | CHANG Yuri | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | CHEN Chloe | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 18 | LIN Tiffany | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 19 | NAM Jiwon | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 20 | KONG Janisa | 1% | 11% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 21 | CHENG Jessica | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | CHOW Ariel | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | CHEUNG Arya | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | KIM Taerin | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 25 | SUN Zoey | 4% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | KENZHEBULATOVA Sara | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | ZEE Bella | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | KIM Olivia | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | LIU Sienna | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 30 | ZHANG Anthea Jia Jia | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | DAI Claire | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% | |
| 32 | SINGH Aditi | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | DING Athena | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 2% | |
| 34 | YI Helen | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 35 | CHEUNG Esabella | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | - | |
| 36 | LEE Jordan | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | DALESSIO Zara Rose | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | JOE Everly | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SUN Grace | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | WYNN Niko | 23% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 41 | HARUTYUNYAN Alisa | 20% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | SONG Esther W | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | QU Iris | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | BORG Annie | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.