Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BAYUS Oliver | V V V V V | V V V V V | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 2 | REHDER Silas | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | HAYES Nathan P. | V D V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 3 | WU Jiachen | D V D D V D | V V V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 5 | WU Shaochi | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 6 | LUNDEN Espen | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 7 | RAWSON Nicholas | V D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 8 | JARRATT Isaac | D D D V V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 9 | SINGH Meet | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 10 | NANAYAKKARA Damin | V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 11 | BOZARTH Alex | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 12 | QU RuiTing | V V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 13 | REHDER Caleb | V V V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 14 | GUO Benjamin | V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 15 | GRAMLICH Bradley | V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 16 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | V V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 17 | MOORE Mary | V V V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 18 | KARASICK Andrew | D V V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 18 | SIMS Martin L. | V V V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 20 | CAVE Rylan | V V V V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 21 | GALIOTE James | V V V V D | D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 22 | AMES Jeremy | V D V V D V | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 23 | HURST Palmer | D V D V V | D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 24 | CHONG Eden | V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 25 | NANAYAKKARA Sanuthi | D V D V D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 26 | RAGSDALE Lillian | D D V V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 27 | PETROVSKI Kiril | D D V D V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 28 | SMITHSON Matthew | D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 29 | CAMPBELL Paul | D D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 30 | HALES Adam | D V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 31 | SOUTHWORTH Connor | D D V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 32 | MARCUS Jonah | D D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 33 | STRAFFORD Andrew | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 34 | SWENSON Jason | D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 35 | HUANG Taohua | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 36 | BADLANI Neel | D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 37 | VILLAVICENCIO Fiorella | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 38 | YANG Chuhan | D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 39 | COTHRAN Nicholas | D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 40 | GAGNON Charles | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 41 | GUARDIOLA JR Oscar | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 42 | AKKALE Reyhan | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 43 | CRAMER Jay | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.