Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BAYUS Oliver | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 2 | REHDER Silas | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 45% | 14% |
| 3 | HAYES Nathan P. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 3 | WU Jiachen | 1% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 5 | WU Shaochi | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 6 | LUNDEN Espen | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 7 | RAWSON Nicholas | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% | |
| 8 | JARRATT Isaac | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 9 | SINGH Meet | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 10 | NANAYAKKARA Damin | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | ||
| 11 | BOZARTH Alex | - | - | 2% | 22% | 61% | 15% | |
| 12 | QU RuiTing | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | REHDER Caleb | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 14 | GUO Benjamin | 3% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 7% | ||
| 15 | GRAMLICH Bradley | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 16 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 17 | MOORE Mary | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 18 | KARASICK Andrew | 1% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 11% | ||
| 18 | SIMS Martin L. | - | 5% | 29% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
| 20 | CAVE Rylan | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 21 | GALIOTE James | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | AMES Jeremy | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 23 | HURST Palmer | - | - | - | 2% | 26% | 71% | |
| 24 | CHONG Eden | 1% | 15% | 58% | 24% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | NANAYAKKARA Sanuthi | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 26 | RAGSDALE Lillian | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | PETROVSKI Kiril | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | SMITHSON Matthew | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | ||
| 29 | CAMPBELL Paul | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 30 | HALES Adam | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 31 | SOUTHWORTH Connor | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | MARCUS Jonah | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% | |
| 33 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 34 | SWENSON Jason | 7% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | ||
| 35 | HUANG Taohua | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | BADLANI Neel | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 37 | VILLAVICENCIO Fiorella | 28% | 51% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | YANG Chuhan | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 39 | COTHRAN Nicholas | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 40 | GAGNON Charles | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | GUARDIOLA JR Oscar | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 42 | AKKALE Reyhan | 24% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | CRAMER Jay | 48% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.