Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Ariana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 2 | LIU Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 49% |
| 3 | PARK Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% |
| 3 | ZHANG Lian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 5 | GONG Hai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 44% |
| 6 | YAO Abby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 42% |
| 7 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% |
| 8 | LEE Zoe E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | |
| 9 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 10 | FANG Kelervia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 27% |
| 11 | YANG Hanli | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% |
| 12 | CHEN Summer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% | 4% |
| 13 | CHUNG Katie | 100% | 100% | 91% | 55% | 14% | ||
| 14 | WU Gloria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | ZHANG Viviana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 25% |
| 16 | LU Keeva | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% | 2% |
| 17 | HOM Emma | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 18 | RUI Jessie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 22% |
| 19 | WEN Cynthia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
| 19 | DAI Iris Yuyang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 21 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% | ||
| 22 | ZEE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% | |
| 22 | YU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 27% | |
| 24 | GOWDA Siyona | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 25 | THOTA Akira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
| 26 | CHENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 27 | FRASER Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 23% |
| 28 | LIN Avery | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | LI Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 3% | - |
| 30 | HOM Avery | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% | |
| 31 | CHOI Jian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 4% | - |
| 33 | KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 6% |
| 34 | ZHANG Katie Q. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 35 | WANG Doreen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | |
| 36 | KHETPAL Aalia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 37 | KIM Ines | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 38 | HUANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | BANDZELADZE Emma | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 40 | DESAI Zoya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 41 | KO Adeline | 100% | 95% | 50% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 42 | BHANGOO Paloma | 100% | 100% | 92% | 58% | 14% | 1% | |
| 43 | DEJOY Leilah | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | CHEN bridgette | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 46 | ZHANG Hannah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 48 | KIM Rylie | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | GUO Jianing | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | PAN Samantha | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 51 | CHEN Madeleine | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 52 | KIM Lauren | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 53 | SAIFEE Sakina | 100% | 100% | 89% | 50% | 11% | ||
| 54 | FAN Lauren | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | LIU Anya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 56 | HONG ELSIE | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 57 | PAWAR Sanvi | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 58 | ZHU Claire | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | TAI Taphanie | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | CHEN Aimee | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | NICOLETTI Thea | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 62 | DONG Nancy | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 63 | YANG Byanca | 100% | 92% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | TIAN Claire | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 65 | LIU Doris-Zihan Zhou | 100% | 96% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | 100% | 99% | 84% | 39% | 7% | - | |
| 67 | SAIFEE Zahra | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 68 | KHANAL Sarah | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 69 | ZHANG Annabelle | 100% | 93% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | YUNG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 10% | 1% |
| 71 | LIU Madeleine | 100% | 93% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | YANG Claire | 100% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 75 | GROSSMAN Elizabeth | 100% | 70% | 28% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 76 | ARCE BASURCO Juliana | 100% | 84% | 33% | 5% | - | - | |
| 77 | LAVERY Lucy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 78 | TATINENI Charvi | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 6% | - | - |
| 78 | FU Joy | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 80 | STOCK Nina | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 81 | YOU Mina | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 82 | LUO Olivia | 100% | 96% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | CHOI Mackenzie | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | PARK Aileen | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 85 | DOMANTAY Sophia | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | OH Amber | 100% | 83% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | ALEKSANDROVA Mira | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 88 | SANTIAGO Rania | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 89 | LAI Olivia | 100% | 86% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | CHO Rylee | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 91 | SOUSA Lauren | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 91 | HUANG Veronica | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 93 | BAKIR Dina | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.