Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PRICE Owen | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | SKOLNICK Michael W. | V D V V V D | V V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 3 | NANAYAKKARA Dinuth | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | CHANG Zane | D V V V V | V V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 5 | CHANG Xavier | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 6 | HAYES Nathan P. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | BORAN Connor | D V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | AN Jasmine N. | V V V V D D | V V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 9 | FAYVUSOVICH Emmanual | V V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | SOPHRONIUS Jeddie | V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 11 | DELANNES-MOLKA Daniel | V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | SINGH Meet | D V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 13 | MITCHELL Robert | V D V V V D | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 14 | ROUNTREE Andrew | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 15 | IVATURI Sivakrishna Nikhil | D D V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 16 | GUARDIOLA Emily | D V V D D D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 17 | SIMANDJUNTAK Joshua | V V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 18 | CONANT Aidan | V D V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 19 | SCHICKEL Juliana | D V D V V V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 20 | JONES Zamauri | V V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | SHEA Aleksander | V D D V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 21 | TINGLE Byrd | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | TANG Justin | V V D D D V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 24 | CICCHI Nicolas | V D D D V V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 25 | LAU-ALLEN Macy | V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 26 | YEE Calvin | D V V D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 27 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | D D V D D V | V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 28 | SOTO Alejandro | D V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 29 | SMITH IV Edward (Ted) A. | V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 30 | LI Happy | D D D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 31 | BLEVINS Carolyn | V D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | SIMANJUNTAK Jocelyn | D D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 33 | JACOFF Amelia | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 34 | KRUPICKA Evelyn | D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 35 | HAVERSON Rana | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 36 | TRAN Katarina | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 37 | DILLENBACK Isaiah | D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 37 | HALL Joshua | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 39 | REARDON Caleb | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.