Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GONG Hai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% |
| 2 | DESAI Zoya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 3 | FRASER Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% |
| 3 | LEE Zoe E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 5 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
| 6 | KHETPAL Aalia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 4% | |
| 7 | THOTA Akira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 8 | CHEN bridgette | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 9 | WU Gloria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 10% |
| 10 | LU Keeva | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 11 | BANDZELADZE Emma | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 12 | LIN Avery | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% |
| 13 | WANG Doreen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
| 14 | CHUNG Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 15 | YUNG Zoe | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 16 | GUO Jianing | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 17 | DONG Nancy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | CHENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
| 19 | SAIFEE Zahra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 11% |
| 20 | FAN Lauren | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 21 | CHEN Summer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | |
| 22 | SAIFEE Sakina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 21% | |
| 22 | WEN Cynthia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
| 24 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 25 | LIU Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | |
| 26 | ZHU Claire | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | CHOI Jian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 7% | |
| 28 | CHEN Aimee | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 2% |
| 29 | ZHANG Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
| 30 | NICOLETTI Thea | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 30 | PAN Samantha | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 32 | LIN Clara | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 33 | ZHANG Selene T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | 1% |
| 34 | KIM Ines | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 7% | |
| 35 | GOWDA Siyona | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
| 35 | KHANAL Sarah | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 37 | LIU Doris-Zihan Zhou | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | HOM Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 39 | KO Adeline | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 40 | ZHAN Catherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 6% | |
| 41 | LI Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 42 | FU Angela | 100% | 93% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 3% |
| 44 | ZHANG Annabelle | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 45 | KIM Rylie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 46 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 47 | PAWAR Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | LAI Olivia | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 49 | TATINENI Charvi | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 50 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 51 | LI Beryl | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% | |
| 52 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 53 | ARCE BASURCO Juliana | 100% | 88% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | ZHANG Katie Q. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 55 | PEROJO Angie | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | ZHOU athena | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 57 | FU Joy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 58 | ALEKSANDROVA Mira | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | HUANG Emma | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 60 | POON Taylor | 100% | 91% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | ZEE Bella | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 63 | YOON Adeline | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 64 | CAO Alexandra | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | DEJOY Leilah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% | 1% |
| 66 | TIAN Claire | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 67 | TUNG Alison | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 68 | CHEN Chloe | 100% | 96% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 69 | HSZIEH Evelyn | 100% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 70 | LIN Tiffany | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 71 | SUTTON Sadie | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 72 | CHEUNG Arya | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 73 | KENZHEBULATOVA Sara | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 74 | KENT Audrey | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 75 | LUO Olivia | 100% | 93% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 76 | YI Helen | 100% | 72% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 77 | ZHANG Anthea Jia Jia | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | GU Ava | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 79 | LIU Celia | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 80 | STOCK Nina | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 81 | JOE Everly | 100% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | SOUSA Lauren | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | SUN Zoey | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 84 | SHU Kayla | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 85 | YOU Mina | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 86 | YANG Claire | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 87 | GAMACHE Camdyn Harper | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 88 | KENZHEBULATOVA Ailin | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 89 | DALESSIO Carmen | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 90 | SU Hermione Su | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 91 | CHOI Mackenzie | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 92 | LU Abigail | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.