San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Sylvia | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 2 | CHO Gracie L. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | LI Phoebe J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | SHIH Diane | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 5 | ALTEN Ayaka | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 6 | LEE Isabelle | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | SU Alysa J. | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 8 | KOROL Neta | V D D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 9 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | V V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 10 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 11 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | CUI Melody J. | D V V V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 13 | KOROL Dana | V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 14 | CHUNG Jaein | V V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 15 | LUO Sandra J. | V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 16 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | D D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | FERNANDES Thea | V D D V V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 18 | TOM Caitlyn | V V V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 19 | SUN Chien-Yu | V V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 20 | SU Alena J. | D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 21 | LEE Samantha X. | D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | GREEN Perri L. | V V V D D | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 23 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | D V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 24 | SUN Ruoxi | V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 25 | HO Rachel E. | D D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | HSIUNG Samantha | D V D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 27 | WALBERT Charlotte B. | V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 28 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | KOSLOW Amicie | D D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 31 | WELBORN Calissa | D V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 32 | LEE Bethanie | V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 33 | UPENDER Cosette K. | D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 34 | DERMETZIS Adriana | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 35 | GONG Chloe | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 36 | LIN Katherine Y. | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 37 | HOBSON Ava | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 38 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 39 | NARBERES Emily R. | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 40 | DHILLON Amani | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 41 | NAGPAL Reyna | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 42 | ELANGOVAN Mamata | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.