San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 25% | |
2 | CHO Gracie L. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
3 | LI Phoebe J. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
3 | SHIH Diane | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
5 | ALTEN Ayaka | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
6 | LEE Isabelle | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
7 | SU Alysa J. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
8 | KOROL Neta | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% | |
9 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
10 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
11 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
12 | CUI Melody J. | 6% | 30% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | |
13 | KOROL Dana | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
14 | CHUNG Jaein | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
15 | LUO Sandra J. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
16 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% | |
17 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
18 | TOM Caitlyn | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
19 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
20 | SU Alena J. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% | |
21 | LEE Samantha X. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
22 | GREEN Perri L. | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
23 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
24 | SUN Ruoxi | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 29% | 6% | |
25 | HO Rachel E. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
26 | HSIUNG Samantha | 22% | 47% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
27 | WALBERT Charlotte B. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
28 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | KOSLOW Amicie | 8% | 39% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | |
31 | WELBORN Calissa | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
32 | LEE Bethanie | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
33 | UPENDER Cosette K. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
34 | DERMETZIS Adriana | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
35 | GONG Chloe | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
36 | LIN Katherine Y. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
37 | HOBSON Ava | 12% | 44% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
38 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
39 | NARBERES Emily R. | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | DHILLON Amani | 33% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
41 | NAGPAL Reyna | 15% | 46% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | ELANGOVAN Mamata | 19% | 47% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.