Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHIOLDI Mina | D D V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
2 | DUCKETT Madison | D V V V D V | V V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
3 | STONE Hava S. | D V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
3 | MIKA Veronica | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
5 | JULIEN Michelle | V V V V D D | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
6 | BAKER Audrey C. | V V V D D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
7 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | D D V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
8 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | V D D V D V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
9 | YODER Bridget H. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
10 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | V V V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
11 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
12 | LI Victoria J. | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
13 | OBRADOVIC Ana | V V V V D D | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
14 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
15 | ATLURI Sara V. | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
16 | TURNOF Kayla M. | V D D D D D | V V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
17 | YONG Erika E. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
18 | NOVICK Mia J. | V V V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 6 | +3.5 |
19 | CANNON Sophia E. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
20 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
21 | TUCKER Iman R. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
22 | HURST Kennedy | D V V V V V | V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
23 | PRIEUR Lauren | V D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
24 | XI Shining | V D V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
25 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | D V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
26 | GIRARDI Aemilia | V V V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
27 | CODY Alexandra C. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
28 | CHIANG Emily | V D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
29 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
30 | KONG Isabel | D V D V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
31 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | D D V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
32 | VESTEL Mira B. | V D V D D D | V V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
33 | ANDRES Katherine A. | D V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
34 | LIN Zhiyin | V V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
35 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | V V V D V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
36 | RIZKALA Joanna | V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
37 | SINHA Anika | V V V D V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
38 | LARIMER Katherine E. | V V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
39 | CHANG Emily | V V D V V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
40 | SHIN Andrea Y. | D V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
41 | BAKER Amelia M. | V D V V D V | D | 1.2 | 4 | +2.8 |
42 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | V V D V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
43 | KITTLE Lauren | V V D V V D | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
44 | TANG Catherine H. | D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
45 | KALRA Siya L. | V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
46 | NEWELL Alexia C. | D D V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
47 | HILD Nisha | D V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
48 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | D D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
49 | KOO Samantha | D V D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
50 | YANG Ashley M. | D D V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
51 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | V V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
52 | SEAL Julie T. | D D D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
53 | DARINGA Arianna | D V D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
54 | HUANG Sharon | V D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
55 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
56 | YANG Angelina | D D V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
57 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | D D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
58 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | D D D V D V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
59 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | D D D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
60 | ZENG Xiaoyi | D D D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
61 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
62 | HOLMES Emma | D D D V D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
63 | LEE Sophia | V D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
64 | KIM Nam Heui | D D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
65 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | D V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
66 | ROGERS Pauline E. | V V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
67 | FEARNS Zara A. | V D D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
68 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | V D V D V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 | |
69 | KRYLOVA Valery | D V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
70 | PETTIT Sara M. | V V D D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
71 | RODGERS Sally E. | V V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
72 | KIM Sujin | D D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
73 | TODD Phoebe | V V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
74 | HAYES Grace Y. | D V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
75 | LIM Isabel K. | D D D V V D | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
76 | DAVIS Charlotte | V V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
77 | XIKES Katherine E. | D D V V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
78 | WHEELER Kira | D D V D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
79 | DHAR Aamina | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
80 | BILILIES Sophia | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
81 | HUNG Anna | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
82 | HSU Mia Y. | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
83 | LIN Selena | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
84 | MARQUES Hannah | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
85 | CUNNINGHAM Erin | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
86 | HU Allison C. | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
87 | NG Sarah W. | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
88 | LI Angela | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
89 | RAHIM Alina O. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
90 | PROBST Alyssa | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.