Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 2 | DUCKETT Madison | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 3 | STONE Hava S. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
| 3 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
| 5 | JULIEN Michelle | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 6 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 7 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 9 | YODER Bridget H. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 10 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 12 | LI Victoria J. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 13 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 15 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 16 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | YONG Erika E. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 18 | NOVICK Mia J. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | < 1% |
| 19 | CANNON Sophia E. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 20 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 21 | TUCKER Iman R. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 22 | HURST Kennedy | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 23 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 24 | XI Shining | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 25 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 26 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 27 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 28 | CHIANG Emily | 1% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 30 | KONG Isabel | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% |
| 31 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 32 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
| 33 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 34 | LIN Zhiyin | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 35 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 36 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | |
| 37 | SINHA Anika | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% |
| 38 | LARIMER Katherine E. | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | CHANG Emily | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 26% | 8% |
| 40 | SHIN Andrea Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 41 | BAKER Amelia M. | 17% | 48% | 29% | 6% | < 1% | - | - |
| 42 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 43 | KITTLE Lauren | 17% | 42% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | TANG Catherine H. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 45 | KALRA Siya L. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 46 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 47 | HILD Nisha | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 49 | KOO Samantha | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% |
| 50 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 51 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 52 | SEAL Julie T. | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 53 | DARINGA Arianna | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 54 | HUANG Sharon | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 55 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | YANG Angelina | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 57 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 58 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 60 | ZENG Xiaoyi | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 62 | HOLMES Emma | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 63 | LEE Sophia | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 64 | KIM Nam Heui | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 66 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 67 | FEARNS Zara A. | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 68 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 69 | KRYLOVA Valery | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 70 | PETTIT Sara M. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 71 | RODGERS Sally E. | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 72 | KIM Sujin | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 73 | TODD Phoebe | 1% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 74 | HAYES Grace Y. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 75 | LIM Isabel K. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 76 | DAVIS Charlotte | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 77 | XIKES Katherine E. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 78 | WHEELER Kira | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | DHAR Aamina | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 80 | BILILIES Sophia | 7% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 81 | HUNG Anna | 1% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 82 | HSU Mia Y. | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 83 | LIN Selena | 8% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 84 | MARQUES Hannah | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 85 | CUNNINGHAM Erin | 54% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 86 | HU Allison C. | 6% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | NG Sarah W. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 88 | LI Angela | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 89 | RAHIM Alina O. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | PROBST Alyssa | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.