Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 2 | CEPERO Rosabel | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
| 3 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 3 | OH Erin H. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
| 5 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 6 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 7 | CHEN Cynthia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 8 | KLINE Melissa C. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 9 | MASUI Konami W. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 10 | DUAN Konnie | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 11 | HECKMANN Emma | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 12 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 13 | RENTON Samantha | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 14 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 22% | |
| 15 | JEWETT Jamie | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 16 | WU Kyra | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | |
| 17 | LUO ZIWEN | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
| 18 | KOROL Neta | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 19 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 20 | WEBB Ella | 3% | 15% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 21 | TONG Ophelia | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 22 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 23 | LAU Chloe M. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 7% |
| 24 | PRIETO Sofia M. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% |
| 25 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 26 | WU Irene M. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 27 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
| 28 | VEERKAMP Molly | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 29 | HEISER Anna M. | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | XUE Alanna | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | PARKER Emilie Rose (Rosie) | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 32 | YU Jaime L. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | SHI Haoqing | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
| 34 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 35 | HUANG NATALIE | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 36 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 37 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 38 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 39 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 40 | PARK Jaimie Lina | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 41 | OESTERREICHER Chloe K. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | VONA Elena M. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 43 | PERLMAN Talia | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% |
| 44 | KANG Jiyoon | 1% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 45 | ATLURI Srija | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 46 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% | |
| 47 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 48 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 49 | WONG Allison M. | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 50 | LEE Ariana | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 52 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 53 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | YEH Marissa E. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 55 | VOHRA Anusha | - | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 56 | FERNANDES Thea | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 57 | TRAN Ava D. | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 58 | WANG ROBIN | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 1% | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 60 | LI Meilin | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 61 | XU Madison | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 62 | YE Eileen | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 63 | HU Victoria | 2% | 12% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 64 | LEE Jessica Doyun | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 65 | ALTEN Ayaka | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 66 | TAN Clarisse | 1% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 67 | KOROL Dana | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 68 | GUERRA Sofia E. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 69 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 70 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 71 | BATRA Chaahat | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | |
| 72 | SHIH Diane | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 73 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 3% | 33% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 74 | WANG Catherine K. | 31% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | - | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 76 | GU Yu Jia | 10% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 77 | HOBSON Leena | 5% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 77 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 79 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 80 | MING YUE | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 81 | RASO Olivia | 3% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 82 | PENG Amber L. | - | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 83 | BOLES Sophia | 24% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | BASSON Bayley D. | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 85 | LI Shuang | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 86 | RASO Sofia G. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 87 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 88 | YOUNG Audrey S. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | YANG Alice | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 90 | CHEN yichun | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 91 | CHARALEL Jessica | 5% | 44% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | HICKS Bronwen | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 93 | MADDOX Lacey E. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 94 | SUN Chien-Yu | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 95 | WILEY Erica | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 96 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 97 | YANIV Liya | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 98 | PAGES Melanie | 9% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.