Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 2 | TANG Alexander L. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | TIKHAEV Alexander | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 3 | ZHENG Marcus | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 32% | |
| 5 | HUANG Eythan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 38% | |
| 6 | LIU Aaron | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | ||
| 7 | GE Felix Fei | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
| 8 | GORDON William L. | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 17% | ||
| 9 | WEI Winston | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 10 | ZHAO Ryan | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 11 | TAY Daniel Yee Jye | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 13 | TANG August L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 49% | 8% |
| 14 | FANG Haoyu | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 15 | ZHANG Jacob | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 16 | RAJ Jay | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 17 | LU Nathan | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 23% | |
| 18 | ZHAN Kevin | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 19 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 20 | YUE Jackson | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 21 | SHIN Noah | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
| 22 | LEE Charles T | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
| 23 | ABRAMKIN Tim | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | METZ Mason | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% | - |
| 25 | XU Nathan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | YU William | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 27 | ULYSSE Jacob | 27% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | ||
| 28 | YANG David H. | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% | ||
| 30 | SONG HAN GYEOL | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | ZHENG Austin | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | LEONG Samuel | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | LEE Thomas | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | ||
| 35 | SINGH Meet | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 36 | HARWOOD Gray | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | LEE Noah | 23% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | AGARWAL Savya | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 39 | KUBBA Krish | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | CHANG Xavier | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | SHAW Spencer | 11% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | WANG Freyr | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 43 | YUN Max | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 44 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 45 | CHANG Zane | 31% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | TIAN Dylan | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.