Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HU Sophie | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 49% |
| 2 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
| 3 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 3 | ZHANG Hannah | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 5 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 6 | SHEN Gloria | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 7 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 43% | |
| 8 | ELLISON Ingrid | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 10 | WANG Joann | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 11 | KHETPAL Aalia | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 12 | GENG Emma | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 13 | LI Doreen | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 14 | KIM Yuna | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 15 | LUO lucy | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 41% | |
| 16 | ZHANG Priscilla | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | ZHU Audrey | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 18 | JU Victoria | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 4% | |
| 19 | FU Joy | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | < 1% | |
| 20 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 4% |
| 21 | MA Sophia | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 22 | FAROOQI Eliora | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 23 | HUANG Emma | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 14% | |
| 24 | HUANG Gabrielle | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | KIM Ines | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 26 | PARK Hannah | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 27 | ZHANG Selina | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 12% | |
| 28 | QIAO Lori-Ann | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 29 | LI Annabelle | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 30 | REILLY Carys | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | WEN Lillian | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | TANG Clementine | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | DONG Audrey | - | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | LU Sophia | 3% | 14% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 35 | KIM Rylie | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | PAK Rosa | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 2% | |
| 37 | FENG Claire | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 38 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | FERRON Sofia | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 40 | YAO Emma | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 41 | MORONES Alieza | 35% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 42 | CHAN Chloe | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 43 | LIU Bella | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 44 | MCCLAIN Madison | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 4% | |
| 45 | WANG Allyson | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | MILLER Anna | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 47 | DONG Nancy | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | FANG Savannah | 20% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | HOLSTAD Anneliese | 3% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | CHAN Jaclyn | 3% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 51 | WANG Michelle | 14% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | XU Charlene | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 53 | WU Karina | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | MCCLAIN Grayce | 1% | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 55 | FU Angela | 10% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | CHEN Arianna | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 57 | HUANG Jiayu | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 58 | DONG Ena | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 59 | MA Annabella | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | CHEN Chloe | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 60 | LEE Soli | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | LEE Annabel | 7% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 63 | PAN Nina | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | DAI Claire | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 65 | JIN Kerina | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 66 | BREWER Gracie | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 67 | LIU Doris | 39% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.