Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 2 | SHIN Noah | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 3 | YU William | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 3 | ZHENG Marcus | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 5 | ABRAMKIN Tim | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 6 | GE Felix Fei | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 7 | XU Nathan | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 8 | LEE Charles T | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 9 | RAJ Jay | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 10 | ZHANG Jacob | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 43% |
| 11 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 12 | AGARWAL Savya | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 13 | YANG David H. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 14 | FAN Ze Lin | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | ZHAO Ryan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 16 | ROBERTSON Liam | 9% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | LIU Alex | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 18 | WANG Mendy | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 19 | LIU Aaron | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 48% | 23% |
| 20 | METZ Mason | - | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 21 | SONG HAN GYEOL | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | YUE Jackson | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 24 | WEI Winston | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% |
| 25 | CHANG Parker | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 19% | |
| 26 | ZHAN Kevin | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 27 | LEONG Samuel | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 28 | LIM EUNSEONG | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 29 | LEE Thomas | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | SHAW Spencer | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | WANG Freyr | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 32 | KIM Aiden | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | ZHENG Austin | 1% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | |
| 34 | LEE Noah | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 35 | CHANG Xavier | 1% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | DI TELLA Ulises | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 37 | KUBBA Krish | 8% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 39 | GELLAD Luke | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 39 | SONG Enoch | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 41 | XU Ryan | 2% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | CHOI Hunter | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 42 | CHANG Zane | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | TIAN Dylan | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | CHEN Ethan | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | HARWOOD Gray | 1% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | XIE Jayden | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | PAN Gary | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | WEBER Andrew | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | YUN Max | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | GORDON William L. | - | < 1% | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
| 52 | WEI JR Shan | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 53 | SIMANDJUNTAK Joshua | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | TSENG Lucas | 4% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | SUN Andrew | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | TIMCHENKO Fiodor | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | LEE Kyle | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | ULYSSE Jacob | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 59 | XU Rambert | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | LIN Oliver | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 61 | YANG George | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.