Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 2 | SHIN Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 3 | YU William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 3 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 5 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% |
| 6 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 7 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% |
| 8 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 9 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 10 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% |
| 11 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | AGARWAL Savya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 13 | YANG David H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 14 | FAN Ze Lin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 15 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 16 | ROBERTSON Liam | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | LIU Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 18 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 19 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 23% |
| 20 | METZ Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
| 21 | SONG HAN GYEOL | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 24 | WEI Winston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 40% | 8% |
| 25 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | |
| 26 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
| 27 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 28 | LIM EUNSEONG | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 29 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | SHAW Spencer | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | WANG Freyr | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 32 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 2% | |
| 34 | LEE Noah | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | CHANG Xavier | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 36 | DI TELLA Ulises | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 37 | KUBBA Krish | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 39 | GELLAD Luke | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 39 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | XU Ryan | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 42 | CHANG Zane | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | HARWOOD Gray | 100% | 99% | 73% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | XIE Jayden | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | PAN Gary | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | WEBER Andrew | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | YUN Max | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 52 | WEI JR Shan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 53 | SIMANDJUNTAK Joshua | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | TSENG Lucas | 100% | 96% | 68% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 55 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | TIMCHENKO Fiodor | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 59 | XU Rambert | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | LIN Oliver | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 61 | YANG George | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.