Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% | ||
| 2 | KIM Natalie | 2% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% | ||
| 3 | HU Sophie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 3 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 49% | 13% | |
| 6 | HUANG Sophie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 46% | 20% |
| 7 | XING Melly | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 8 | FENG Claire | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | ||
| 9 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% | |
| 10 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 11 | ZHU Ella | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 12 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 13 | CAO Amelie | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 14 | DONG Katelyn | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 15 | HUANG Natalie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 16 | LIN Katherine | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 17 | MA Emily(Yiming) | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | MA Sophia | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 19 | LI Junhan | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 20 | SONG Erin | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 8% |
| 21 | ZHANG Priscilla | 3% | 19% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 22 | LIU Bella | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | ZHENG Annalyn | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% | ||
| 24 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 24 | ZHANG Caroline | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 24 | LUO lucy | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | TAN Dorathy | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 42% |
| 28 | CHO Olivia | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 29 | POEI Meagan | 4% | 35% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | KIM Ines | 2% | 25% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | WU Lorena | 2% | 12% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 32 | KHETPAL Aalia | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 33 | SUN Erin | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 34 | ZHANG Hannah | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 35 | PHAN Logan | - | 8% | 33% | 42% | 14% | 1% | |
| 36 | GENG Emma | 21% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 37 | WU Charlotte | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 38 | LEO Jenna | 2% | 12% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 39 | HUANG Annabelle | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | SELSER Ella | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 42 | SONG Sarah | 38% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 43 | DZIWULSKI Elisabeth Claire | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | LU Chloe | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | JOSEPH Rachel | 41% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | LUEKEN Adelina | 14% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | LOBO Sophie | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 48 | JAIN Dia | 4% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.