Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
| 2 | HUANG Natalie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 3 | ZHU Ella | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 46% | 13% |
| 3 | CAO Amelie | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 5 | ZHANG Hannah | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 6 | LUO lucy | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 7 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 8 | KIM Natalie | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 9 | XING Melly | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 10 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 11 | LIN Katherine | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 12 | HU Sophie | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 13 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 15 | LEO Jenna | 1% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% | ||
| 16 | ZHANG Priscilla | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | ZHU Audrey | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | ZHANG Selina | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 29% | 5% |
| 19 | DONG Katelyn | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 20 | REILLY Carys | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | SMOLICH Emily | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
| 22 | PHAN Logan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 23 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
| 24 | GENG Emma | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 25 | WANG Joann | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 26 | CHOI Cara | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 26 | FU Joy | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | LI Doreen | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | |
| 30 | DZIWULSKI Elisabeth Claire | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | ||
| 31 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | KIM Ines | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | KIM Yuna | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | ||
| 34 | CHO Olivia | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 35 | PAK Rosa | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | ||
| 36 | FENG Claire | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
| 38 | PARK Hannah | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | XU Charlene | 2% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 39 | KHETPAL Aalia | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 41 | LI Annabelle | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | ZHANG Caroline | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 43 | SHEN Gloria | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% | |
| 44 | LIAW Audrey | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | DONG Nancy | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | LI Beatrice | 1% | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | LU Chloe | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | HUANG Gabrielle | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 49 | LIU Bella | 1% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | SUN Erin | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 51 | ELLISON Ingrid | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 52 | QIAO Lori-Ann | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 53 | SINGH Evangelina | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 54 | MA Sophia | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | HUANG Emma | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 56 | MCCLAIN Madison | 3% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 57 | LEE Annabel | 15% | 44% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | CULLIVAN Elise | 10% | 51% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | DONG Audrey | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 61 | WU Charlotte | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 62 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 63 | FAROOQI Eliora | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | MILLER Anna | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 65 | YAO Emma | 5% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 66 | TANG Clementine | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | LIU Doris | 40% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | JOSEPH Rachel | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | ||
| 69 | WANG Allyson | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 69 | CHAN Chloe | 15% | 35% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 71 | ZHU Alicia | 25% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 72 | HUANG Annabelle | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 73 | LOBO Sophie | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | LEE Soli | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 75 | GOEL Saanvi | 48% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.