October NAC

Div II Men's Saber

Monday, October 15, 2018 at 12:00 PM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 BERGMAN Thomas C. V V V V D V V V V V V 3.0 4 +1.0
2 HARLEY Sage N. D V D V D V V V V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
3 LAI Eric A. D V V V D V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
3 JEFFORDS Alexander V D V D V V V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
5 TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
6 ESCUETA Tony V. D V D V V V V V D 1.3 3 +1.7
7 GINIS Nathan V D V D V V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
8 WOOD Elden S. D D V V V V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
9 JONES Graham H. V V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
10 LUEBBE Macklan C V V V V D V V V D 2.6 5 +2.4
11 WU Nicholas R. V V V V D V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
12 D'ORAZIO Joseph V D V V V D V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
13 VASILYEV Nikita K. D D V V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
13 KANG Brandon M. V D V V V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
15 CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. D V D D V V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
16 DRESSELL Wiley D D V D V V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
17 RIVERA Inigo Franco V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
18 LIMB Matthew G. V V V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
19 KIM Sean G. V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
20 HAMMER Peter A. V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
21 MOSKOWITZ Mason C. V V V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
22 DANNULL Linus N. V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
23 ZHOU Matthew R. V D V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
24 VAULES Charles W. V V V V V D V D 4.9 5 +0.1
25 QIU Le V V V D V V V D 2.6 5 +2.4
26 SHANAHAN Adam E. D V V V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
27 FLORES Peter D. V V V V D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
28 YEN Joshua C. V D V D V V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
29 HOLMES Aiden G. V V D D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
30 BROWNE JR Rolston D. D D D V V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
31 CORNEJO Jeffrey A. D V D V D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
32 GREMILLION Ezekiel R. V D D D V D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
33 YOUNG Nash V V D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
34 WUN William V V D V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
35 KOKKIN Jack S. D V V V D V D 1.9 4 +2.1
36 YAN Jack P. V V D V V D D 3.3 4 +0.7
37 CHANG Howard V D V D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
38 YATES Colum C. D D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
39 GREENE Joseph T. D V V D V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
40 TSAO Ethan D V D V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
41 WINKLER Lucas G. V D V V D D D 4.5 3 -1.5
42 KEEFE Duncan D V D D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
43 GAFFNEY John M. D D V V D D 1.2 2 +0.8
44 HUANG Zekai D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
45 LASORSA Matthew V D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
46 GAUTAM Dhruv D V D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
47 EPSTEIN Henry N. V V D D D D 2.0 2 -
48 LAI Adam J. D V D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
49 WYCHE Scott H. V D V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
50 FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. V D D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
51 DRESSELL Wyatt C. D V D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
52 GOTTSCHALK Alexander P. D D V D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
53 WINEBURNER J.T. D D V D V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
54 ZHOU Miles V D D D D V D 0.9 2 +1.1
55 FILS-AIME Jacob E. D D D V V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
56 KIM Benjamin H. V V D D D D D 3.9 2 -1.9
57 PASTOR-JOBIN Matis D D D V D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
58 SMITLEY Tyler J. D V D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
59 HOEY-WASOW Henry V D D D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
60 UEYAMA Ietetsu A. D D D D D V V D 1.9 1 -0.9
61 NARANJO David E. D D D D D V V D 1.0 1 -
62 KRATZ Alexander D D V D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
63 GOLDBERG Gabriel A. D V D D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
64 HONE Marc D D D D D V D 1.7 0 -1.7
65 PARKER Timothy S. D V D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
66 GRINAGE Alex M. D D D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
67 AHN Sung-Ho V D D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
68 PROGRESSOV Dmitrii V D D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
69 BARBEE Jackson D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
70 LARSON Eric H. D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
71 TREJO Oliver D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
71 PIHLSTROM Richie D D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.