Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HOU Gaven | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 2 | XU Nathan | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | WANG Luke | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | CHANG Parker | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 5 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | NOVIKOV Yann | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | HU Weijie | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 8 | ZHONG Kingsley | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 9 | BRADY David | V V D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 10 | SUSANTO William | D V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 11 | LI Jayden | V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 12 | JABLOKOV Roman | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) | V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | AHMAD Uzayr | D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 15 | BRILLANTES Luke | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 16 | MASON Frederick | D D D D V | V V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 17 | ZHANG Aaron | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 18 | LI Andrew | V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 19 | HU Michael | V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | TIAN Dylan | D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | DENG Jonathan | V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 22 | DAVIDSON Henry | V V D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 23 | SUN Nathan | D V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | REN Ryan | V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | ZHAO David | V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 27 | HU Daniel | D V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 28 | KERSHA Alexander | V D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | CORDERO Javier | D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | FANG Ryan | D V D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 31 | WONG Maxwell | V D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 32 | ZHANG Eric | V V D D D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 33 | TIAN Andy | D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 33 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | D V V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 35 | SHINDE Aksh | V V D V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 36 | ROPER Griffin | V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 37 | LU Hansen | V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 38 | FOMIN Dashiell | V D V V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 39 | LECH Landon | V D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 40 | ZHENG Vincent | V D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 41 | MANCHALA Vedanth | V V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 41 | KEEGAN Cole | V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 43 | LIU KELVIN | V D V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 44 | HASSETT Edward | V D D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 45 | LIN Lucas | D V D D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 46 | DAVE Neil | V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 47 | KROLEWSKI Nathaniel | D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 48 | GOLI Arush | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 49 | CHEN Kevin | D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 50 | MOON Nolan | D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 51 | SUN Andrew | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 52 | CUI Mason | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 53 | CHEUNG Gio | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 54 | WULIN Nicholas | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 55 | MACCIOLI Daniel | V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 56 | IM Andrew | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 56 | XU Jaden | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 58 | LAQUER Tyler | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 59 | TANAKA Nico | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 60 | LIU Kunshuo | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 61 | PELLERIN Liam | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 61 | WILSON Henry | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 63 | BHOSREKAR Som | D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 64 | CASSIE Charles | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 65 | BLAIS julian | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 66 | ANDERSON Kai | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 67 | CONNELLY Malcolm | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.