Treasure Island YMCA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHAN Mila | - | - | - | - | - | 11% | 88% |
| 2 | THOTA Akira | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% | |
| 3 | PAN Samantha | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 23% |
| 3 | LAM Dorris Yandor | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 5 | LIN Avery | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 6 | HOM Emma | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 7 | CHOI Jian | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 8 | KIM Ines | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 9 | NICOLETTI Thea | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
| 10 | JOESUF Thea | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 11 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 12 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 39% | 3% |
| 13 | YUNG Zoe | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% |
| 14 | KIM Audrey | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 15 | CHUNG Charlotte | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 16 | ZHU Claire | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | PAWAR Sanvi | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
| 18 | GUO Jianing | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | TATINENI Charvi | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | SHU Kayla | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | KO Adeline | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% | 1% |
| 22 | ZALTZMAN Maya | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
| 23 | KHANAL Sarah | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% | |
| 24 | PAK SU YEON | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 25 | DONG Nancy | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
| 26 | TANG Ming-Hao (Audrey) | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | ZHAI Muyan | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 28 | CHEN Chloe | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | TIAN Claire | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
| 30 | LUO Olivia | 2% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 31 | TUNG Alison | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 32 | LAI Olivia | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Annabelle | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | LEE Clara | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | GAO Nicole | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | TAGNE Zoey | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | JUSON Julianne Lauren | 9% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | LIN Vienna | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 39 | CHANG Audrey | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 40 | KO Alyssa | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 41 | LI Claire | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | ALEKSANDROVA Miroslava | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | YANG Claire | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | KUO Esme | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | LEE Madison | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | YEN Kayleigh | 5% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | GU Alexandra | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 49 | WANG Muse | 40% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | HSU Courtney | 18% | 43% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | CHEN Celina | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 52 | ROSIN Milena | 40% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LEE Juniper | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CHUNG Songyoon | 32% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | SCHOR Katherine | 31% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | LOPEZ-HOR Emma Meixian | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | GUO Christine | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | YANG Lucy | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | MISSON Arya | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | LEE Annalyn | 30% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | SOUSA Lauren | 14% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | KUO Liang-Jun | 20% | 47% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | DONG Ena | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.