Junior Olympics

Cadet Women's Épée

Friday, January 9, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SHIV Avni 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 61%
2 WANG Chloe 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 11%
3 WANG Ziqi (yoyo) 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 49%
3 HAUSHEER Kuncen 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 39% 5%
5 CAMPBELL Eva 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 44%
6 PROFIS Liora 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 65%
7 LEE Claire 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 43%
8 KOZLOWSKI Maya M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 56%
9 TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 76%
10 FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 40%
11 HOLDEN Helena 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 40% 8%
12 YOUNG VIVIAN 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 67%
12 DHAIYA Tanya 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 15%
14 GUO Luxi 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 51%
15 YILMAZ Pinar 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 40%
16 XU Jessica 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 33% 5%
17 LEE Scarlett 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 66%
18 BALAKRISHNAN Trisha 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 32%
19 WU Michelle 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 44%
20 ABUELFUTUH Sama 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 40%
21 LI Caroline 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 10%
22 WEI Sherry 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 38% 8%
23 CAMAMA Tessa 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 52% 15%
24 ADYANTHAYA Anika 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 16%
25 LI Yunxuan (Joy) 100% 99% 87% 55% 21% 4% -
26 WANG Zoe 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 68%
27 SMUK Alexandra S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 63%
28 GOH Cayla 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 30%
29 WATTANAKIT Anda 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 57% 15%
30 MCQUEEN Morgan 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 3%
31 LEE Eden 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 11% 1%
32 GIERAT-KATZ Izabella 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 7% 1%
33 SEREGIN Katya 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 46%
34 NEELAM Navya 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 24%
35 ZHENG Erin 100% 99% 92% 64% 27% 5% < 1%
36 WONG Caitlin 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 53% 12%
37 WU Jessica 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 41% 8%
38 XU Serena 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 28%
39 CARRIER Meredith 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 21%
40 SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 22% 2%
41 SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 26% 4%
42 CHERNIS Liah 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 40% 7%
43 MENDOZA zoie 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 39% 9%
44 XIAO Katelyn 100% 98% 83% 51% 18% 3% -
45 XU Emily (Hua) 100% 98% 86% 52% 17% 2% -
46 WONG Sydney 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 12% 1%
47 OLELE Ifechi 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 12%
48 KALGAONKAR Arohi 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 27% 4%
48 XU Amy(Chenyu) 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 13% 1%
50 SCHMITT Harper 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 52% 8%
51 GAN Shelby 100% 99% 91% 64% 26% 5% -
52 BRIDGE Rebekah 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 17%
52 NING Miranda 100% 100% 97% 78% 38% 7%
54 DEPOMMIER-GONZALEZ Isabelle 100% 100% 100% 92% 65% 26% 4%
54 MOLLINIER Angel 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 27% 4%
56 RICHARDSON Meredith 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 20%
57 ANEZIOKORO Zahra 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 24% 4%
58 ILYAS Ayah 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 29%
58 CHI Zoe 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 19% 2%
60 LIN Laura 100% 100% 98% 83% 47% 13% 1%
61 BISONO Valentina 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 12% 1%
62 FRANGER Macy 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 38%
63 RICHARDS Axelle 100% 97% 78% 39% 11% 1% -
64 LEE Gloria Y. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 28%
65 DYMAR Anna 100% 100% 96% 73% 31% 5% < 1%
66 HANKINS Morgan 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 30%
67 KOUAME Candice 100% 99% 88% 52% 16% 2% -
68 HERNASA Anna 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 17%
69 QI Julieanne 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 30%
70 GANSER Nicole 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 47% 11%
71 JEYOON Lauren 100% 100% 87% 50% 15% 2%
72 LAW Mila 100% 95% 70% 29% 5% -
73 AIRES Julia 100% 99% 87% 54% 18% 2%
73 BURKS Madison 100% 100% 96% 78% 43% 13% 1%
75 PRESMAN Aerin 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 18%
75 SHEFFIELD Skye 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 39% 7%
77 LISCUM Vivian 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 29%
78 STERN Savannah 100% 99% 91% 62% 22% 2%
78 MARTINEZ Christina 100% 100% 96% 80% 50% 19% 3%
80 LEE Camilla 100% 100% 98% 86% 50% 11%
81 BURROWS Beatrice 100% 95% 66% 26% 5% -
82 PEI Claire 100% 100% 93% 67% 29% 6% -
82 ZHUANG Lauren 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 21% 2%
84 IYER Ishana 100% 100% 98% 82% 44% 10%
85 VENKATESAN Harshitha 100% 97% 77% 38% 10% 1%
86 LIN Isabel 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 16% 2%
87 BEATIE Isabella M. 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 24% 3%
88 KAKANI Aditi 100% 99% 92% 63% 26% 5% -
88 FU Shannon 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 17% 2%
90 PILSON Rebecca 100% 100% 97% 83% 54% 21% 4%
91 FENG Esther 100% 96% 69% 29% 7% 1% -
92 MAI Mailan 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 32% 4%
93 WANG Cecilia 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 18% 2%
94 RASHID Summer 100% 97% 79% 45% 14% 2% -
95 VOSKOV Olivia 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 18% 2%
96 BURICEA Ada 100% 100% 99% 88% 60% 24% 4%
97 DOBROSAVLJEVIĆ Kalina 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 50% 12%
97 CHEONG Chloe 100% 93% 65% 27% 5% -
99 SCHOR Elisabeth 100% 100% 94% 69% 27% 4%
99 MERRIMAN Rie 100% 100% 100% 95% 71% 31% 5%
101 LEVKOV Maita 100% 97% 77% 36% 9% 1% -
102 ZHU Riley 100% 100% 97% 81% 43% 11% 1%
102 BURT Emmalyne Grace 100% 93% 65% 27% 5% -
104 KENT Laurel 100% 100% 96% 70% 30% 6% 1%
104 TALANDZEVICIUS Sophia 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 48% 8%
106 YU Julie 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 27% 5%
106 FENG Iris 100% 99% 89% 60% 25% 5% -
108 WANG Jessie 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 16%
109 STERR Isabella M. 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 46%
110 KROPP Anne (Charlie) 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 25% 3%
111 DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena 100% 100% 93% 66% 25% 3%
111 YUNG Bethany 100% 100% 97% 79% 39% 9% 1%
113 XIONG Alice 100% 96% 75% 40% 12% 2% -
114 KANE Chloe 100% 98% 83% 47% 14% 2%
115 WANG Ziqiao (Claire) 100% 100% 98% 78% 39% 10% 1%
116 BERGAN Bailey 100% 89% 54% 19% 4% - -
117 LOBANOVA Varvara 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 18% 1%
118 DESAI Ela 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 5% -
119 EDGAR Koko 100% 78% 35% 7% 1% -
120 KANE Alexa 100% 97% 79% 44% 14% 2% -
121 MAENG Gloria 100% 93% 62% 21% 3% - -
121 PETROFF Eva 100% 100% 96% 78% 43% 13% 1%
123 WANG Chantal 100% 98% 83% 47% 13% 1%
124 RAMEY Alexa 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 8% 1%
125 KUMAR Eva 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 49% 12%
127 CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea 100% 95% 68% 27% 5% - -
128 BROWN Marie 100% 78% 36% 9% 1% -
129 YU Chloe 100% 99% 86% 53% 17% 3% -
130 SHETH Anayaà 100% 96% 74% 35% 8% 1% -
131 GARCIA Sophia Noelle 100% 84% 40% 10% 1% - -
132 CHEN Allison 100% 74% 30% 6% - -
133 BEAVER Ava 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 16%
134 ZHAN Clare 100% 95% 70% 31% 7% 1% -
135 RADOV Una 100% 99% 90% 58% 20% 3% -
136 HOWARD Katherine 100% 95% 66% 26% 5% - -
137 FISCHBEIN Quinley 100% 100% 97% 80% 43% 12% 1%
137 MYRAH Vivienne 100% 100% 98% 81% 43% 11% 1%
137 MEMON Insha 100% 100% 95% 74% 36% 9% 1%
140 HERD Angela 100% 99% 87% 55% 21% 4% -
141 LI Alice 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 14% 1%
142 KANASKAR Ila 100% 100% 99% 92% 63% 22% 3%
143 JORDAN Zoe 100% 96% 75% 38% 9% 1%
144 BOROTKO Katerina 100% 100% 93% 69% 31% 7% -
145 ZOU You yang (Yoyo) 100% 100% 93% 62% 23% 4% -
146 JU Jennifer 100% 98% 81% 43% 11% 1% -
147 KAUR Manroop 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 39% 8%
147 ROMANOV Mia 100% 68% 15% 1% - - -
149 BUCA Nora 100% 100% 94% 69% 30% 6% -
150 ELTERMAN Kate 100% 100% 95% 77% 44% 14% 2%
151 SHI Elle 100% 79% 38% 10% 1% - -
152 LEE Emily 100% 99% 92% 66% 27% 4%
153 MENG Fina 100% 98% 82% 44% 12% 2% -
154 LI Jasmine 100% 97% 77% 34% 7% 1% -
155 YOUN Kylie 100% 97% 80% 48% 19% 4% -
156 JIANG Alexandra 100% 99% 84% 50% 17% 3% -
157 SUN Karolyn 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 14% 2%
158 BECKMAN Amaya 100% 97% 80% 46% 16% 3% -
159 JORGENSEN Kjirsten 100% 100% 94% 71% 32% 7% -
160 MARKS Madeline 100% 94% 66% 26% 5% - -
161 MARTIN Avery 100% 96% 79% 48% 18% 4% -
162 NOLAN Sophia 100% 92% 63% 27% 6% 1% -
163 KOU Cynthia 100% 96% 57% 17% 2% -
164 YOON Elsa 100% 88% 49% 13% 2% - -
165 MISHIMA Audrey 100% 100% 99% 92% 62% 19% 2%
166 CHEN Ava 100% 99% 92% 64% 26% 5% -
167 GRAZIANO Ruby Mae 100% 95% 60% 21% 4% - -
169 CHOI Lydia 100% 83% 43% 12% 2% - -
169 SHEIKH PAREE 100% 96% 70% 30% 7% 1% -
171 KUTSY Olga 100% 100% 92% 64% 27% 5% -
172 NGUYEN Ella 100% 98% 87% 60% 28% 7% 1%
173 TISDALE Zaria 100% 56% 15% 2% - - -
174 CHEN Sunny 100% 97% 76% 38% 9% 1% -
175 OLSON Olivia 100% 94% 65% 25% 5% - -
176 KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 7%
177 PORTER Cora 100% 63% 21% 3% - - -
178 CUEVA Viola 100% 100% 94% 71% 36% 10% 1%
179 GOCHBERG Madeline 100% 62% 19% 3% - - -
181 WU Emma 100% 77% 31% 6% - - -
182 GORE Amina 100% 55% 11% 1% - - -
183 WHITELAW Shyann 100% 84% 49% 18% 4% - -
184 HOUSMANS Emma 100% 63% 17% 2% - - -
185 D'ANGELO Olivia 100% 81% 36% 8% 1% - -
186 VIPPAGUNTA Anagha 100% 84% 43% 11% 1% - -
187 BUES Caelan 100% 74% 26% 4% - - -
188 THOMAS Mackenzie 100% 71% 27% 5% - - -
189 YANAGIDA Coco 100% 65% 24% 5% - - -
191 PETRIZZO Anna 100% 64% 22% 4% - - -
192 CLEMMER-BECHT Elise 100% 82% 39% 8% 1% - -
193 STRATHMAN Cordelia 100% 77% 34% 8% 1% - -
193 GULLAPALLI sruthi 100% 40% 7% 1% - -
193 GOODWIN OTANO Violet 100% 96% 74% 37% 10% 1% -
196 LEE Lauren Jinju 100% 72% 26% 4% - - -
197 HSU Catherine 100% 68% 24% 4% - - -
198 RAPTIS Layla 100% 68% 22% 3% - - -
199 RAGSDALE Lillian 100% 64% 19% 3% - - -
200 GRAZIANO Josephine 100% 58% 17% 2% - - -
200 LAKE Isabella 100% 72% 21% 3% - - -
202 KWON Claire 100% 89% 51% 16% 3% - -
204 HANDELMAN Charlotte 100% 65% 20% 3% - - -
205 SHUKLA Annika 100% 53% 8% 1% - - -
206 LEE Adelynn 100% 99% 87% 55% 19% 3% -
206 KELSEY Fabienne 100% 74% 26% 4% - - -
208 LAU Karina 100% 75% 28% 5% - - -
209 FANG Olivia 100% 47% 11% 1% - -
210 JEANBAPTISTE Lauren 100% 87% 49% 15% 2% - -
210 MADANNAVAR Trisha 100% 77% 33% 7% 1% - -
212 SHIN Jamie 100% 86% 49% 16% 3% - -
213 WILKENS Lorelei 100% 65% 23% 5% - - -
214 MORET Teagan 100% 28% 3% - - - -
215 MONESTERE Gianna 100% 60% 17% 2% - - -
216 TORRES RAVELO Zoe 100% 70% 24% 4% - - -
216 DREWRY Alexandra 100% 55% 13% 2% - - -
216 KHANNA Bhairavi 100% 18% 1% - - - -
219 NAPOLI Eleanor 100% 51% 12% 1% - - -
219 JOHN Elsa 100% 78% 38% 10% 1% - -
219 CHI Evelyn 100% 16% 1% - - -
222 LEUNG Morgan 100% 42% 8% 1% - - -
223 CUFF Addison 100% 61% 16% 2% - - -
224 WILKINS Emma 100% 100% 95% 65% 26% 5% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.