Junior Olympics

Junior Women's Foil

Saturday, January 10, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CALISE Ella - - - - 3% 25% 72%
2 FEDELI Caterina S. - - - - 1% 14% 86%
3 CHEN Jia P. - - - - 1% 23% 75%
3 LIU Joy Zhaoyi - - - - 1% 16% 83%
5 LEE Lavender - - - - 2% 24% 74%
6 CHO Rebecca H. - - - - 1% 17% 82%
7 KIM Rachel - - - 6% 42% 51%
8 FENG Grace - - - 3% 18% 44% 36%
9 SUN Chloe - - - - 2% 19% 79%
10 YANG Iris - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
11 DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) - - - 5% 27% 48% 20%
12 SHEN Lydia - - - 1% 12% 44% 43%
13 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia - 1% 12% 42% 44%
14 LI Han (Helina) - - 1% 7% 24% 42% 26%
15 NISSINOFF Alexandra - - - 1% 9% 44% 47%
16 PEVZNER Victoria - - - - 2% 21% 77%
17 JANG Kimberley - - - 1% 8% 42% 49%
18 SHIM Grace J. - - - 3% 22% 53% 22%
18 JOO Natalie - - - 4% 27% 52% 17%
20 SAIFEE Lamya - 1% 6% 28% 41% 21% 3%
21 ZOU Ella - - 5% 24% 44% 27%
22 ORVANANOS Anice - - - 3% 19% 45% 33%
23 MI Aileen - - - 4% 30% 66%
24 HARRIS Julia - - 2% 14% 40% 37% 6%
25 MANIKTALA Prisha - - 2% 16% 44% 35% 4%
26 GOOR Viviene E. - - - 1% 7% 34% 59%
27 EYER Hailey M. - - - - 1% 19% 80%
28 DENG Melissa - - - 1% 14% 44% 41%
29 BAE Yooju - - 2% 16% 38% 34% 9%
30 KNAPP Isabella 4% 30% 41% 21% 4% -
31 SUN Emily - - 1% 10% 33% 41% 15%
32 MCSHERRY Ava - - - 2% 18% 53% 27%
33 CHEN Renee - - - - 4% 31% 64%
34 COOPER Piper W. - - - 4% 25% 58% 12%
35 YANG Emma - - - - 3% 24% 73%
36 HSU Kaylin - - - 5% 25% 48% 22%
36 YANG Audrey - - - 2% 18% 52% 28%
38 ZHANG Alina C. - - - - 6% 32% 62%
39 SEO IRENE Y. - - - 1% 12% 44% 44%
40 FENG Audrey - - 1% 10% 36% 47% 6%
41 BING Charlotte - - 4% 20% 42% 32% 2%
42 ZHANG Ivy - - 3% 19% 43% 31% 4%
43 XIE Su - 1% 10% 35% 37% 14% 2%
44 FIELD Elizabeth - 2% 17% 39% 33% 8% -
44 WANG DINA C. - 2% 15% 40% 35% 8% -
44 NEUMANN Erika 1% 15% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
47 ZHOU Joi - 4% 23% 46% 24% 4% -
48 SHEN Emilia - - - - 5% 35% 59%
49 MCFARLANE Asha - 1% 10% 32% 38% 17% 2%
50 AYUPOVA AMELIYA - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 9%
51 LIU Ariana - 2% 13% 35% 36% 13% 1%
52 LAI Sophia - - 2% 14% 42% 42%
53 LIU Samantha - 1% 7% 29% 50% 13%
54 CHEN Chloe I. - - - - 3% 28% 69%
55 SHENG Katherine - - 2% 17% 41% 33% 6%
56 TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite 1% 11% 32% 37% 16% 2%
57 MCSHERRY Kayla - - 3% 22% 45% 25% 4%
58 FIELD Julianna - - - 5% 28% 55% 11%
59 ZELDIN Nadia - 1% 10% 35% 41% 12% 1%
60 CHEN Allison V. - - - - 2% 23% 75%
61 JOO Sara - 4% 23% 40% 26% 6% -
62 JACOB Norah 2% 31% 48% 18% 2% -
63 ROZPEDOWSKI Claire - - - 4% 24% 48% 23%
64 PEDERSEN Haley 1% 11% 44% 35% 8% 1% -
65 ZHAO Olivia - 2% 13% 35% 35% 13% 2%
66 LIU Angel(Daying) - - 1% 12% 39% 37% 11%
67 PARK Lina - - 2% 15% 43% 36% 4%
68 REN Kayley - 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4%
69 VILLARAMA Kara - 3% 21% 43% 27% 6% -
70 WANG Amabel - - 5% 21% 40% 29% 5%
71 TAO Ann 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5% -
72 KIM Sydney - 6% 25% 39% 24% 4%
73 OUYANG Bridgette Z. - - - 1% 7% 40% 52%
74 DE CASTRO Kai - 3% 25% 43% 24% 4% -
75 PEVZNER Nicole 1% 8% 31% 44% 16%
76 BABIAC Julia - - 2% 16% 54% 28%
77 BROWN Lola - 1% 6% 24% 43% 24% 3%
78 LENK Sophie - - 2% 17% 45% 32% 3%
79 KIM Claire - 1% 10% 30% 39% 19% 1%
80 CHAN Ella - 2% 18% 41% 32% 7% -
81 CHOW Annabelle - - - 3% 17% 43% 38%
82 MEI Sarah - - - 3% 19% 43% 34%
83 KRAHE Annika - 3% 21% 41% 29% 6% -
84 LI Christina 2% 15% 35% 34% 12% 1% -
85 CHO Karis 2% 13% 35% 37% 13% 1% -
86 SWANSON Alexa - - 2% 13% 36% 37% 11%
87 WANG CAROL - - 3% 18% 40% 34% 5%
88 HAN Katherine - 3% 18% 39% 31% 8% -
89 WU Chingfei Amber - 1% 9% 32% 44% 13% 1%
90 GUAN Adeline - 1% 5% 21% 40% 30% 3%
91 MARISI Gianna - - 7% 30% 44% 17% 2%
92 SHIN Elizabeth 4% 23% 40% 27% 5% -
93 BASSIK Eva 1% 15% 38% 34% 11% 1%
94 ZHU Ella 24% 47% 24% 5% - -
95 CULLIVAN Sienna 8% 33% 41% 17% 2%
96 WANG Joanna - 1% 9% 33% 41% 16%
97 BERGEL Daphne 1% 13% 36% 36% 13% 1%
98 MU Allison - - 1% 8% 34% 43% 15%
99 YONG Rosalind - 1% 10% 31% 38% 18% 3%
100 CAO Kayla - 7% 30% 39% 20% 4% -
101 MUMMANENI Samyuta 2% 15% 36% 34% 12% 1%
102 HAFEZ Tahiyah - 2% 13% 33% 36% 15% 1%
103 LEVESQUE Brielle - 2% 17% 43% 32% 6% -
103 WATSON Evelyn - 5% 24% 42% 24% 5% -
105 XIE Lillian - - 5% 23% 40% 26% 6%
106 LIU Enjia Sherry liu - - 3% 20% 45% 29% 3%
107 MIYASHIRO Katelyn - 2% 14% 37% 38% 9% -
108 HOROWITZ Shuli - 3% 23% 42% 27% 4% -
109 ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya - 8% 36% 39% 15% 2% -
110 LI Joy - 6% 22% 37% 27% 7% -
111 AADHI Hansika - - 6% 26% 42% 24% 2%
112 LI Katerina - 4% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2%
113 VO Bao-Vy - 1% 7% 30% 43% 17% 2%
114 STRUGAR Steliana - 2% 17% 39% 33% 9%
115 DONG Emily - 6% 32% 49% 13% 1%
116 ORBE-AUSTIN Nia 13% 40% 35% 10% 1%
117 ZHANG Eunice - 1% 11% 34% 41% 13%
118 EPSTEIN Naomi 3% 37% 44% 14% 1% -
119 ZAMLYNNY Maya 1% 11% 37% 36% 13% 2% -
119 EYER Brooke - 2% 18% 45% 29% 6% -
121 SHAOOLIAN Maya 3% 22% 41% 27% 5% - -
122 HSIAO Ariya - 3% 22% 44% 27% 4% -
123 SHMAY Anastasia - - 4% 20% 43% 29% 4%
124 CHEN Sophie 1% 7% 29% 40% 21% 3% -
125 HSU Rachel 20% 46% 28% 5% - - -
126 KANG Marian 5% 27% 39% 23% 6% 1% -
127 ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. 2% 16% 36% 32% 12% 2% -
128 RIVERA Leahy 1% 16% 45% 31% 7% - -
129 LI Alice - 1% 9% 30% 40% 19% 1%
130 LIU Ashley - 5% 28% 42% 21% 4% -
131 STEWART Isla 35% 52% 13% 1% - - -
132 URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia 1% 8% 31% 39% 19% 3% -
133 PUOPOLO Mia 3% 25% 45% 22% 4% - -
134 ARYA Leela 27% 48% 22% 4% - - -
135 TAN Dorathy - 5% 32% 42% 18% 2% -
136 WYNN Kylie - 1% 12% 35% 38% 14% 1%
137 HAN Crystal - - 4% 22% 49% 22% 2%
137 YAO Abby - 2% 23% 42% 27% 5% -
139 DIMATULAC Elise Ann - 1% 6% 23% 41% 26% 4%
140 PHAN Logan 7% 48% 36% 8% 1% - -
141 CHO Olivia 6% 27% 41% 22% 5% - -
142 LUO Miranda - - 5% 22% 43% 27% 3%
143 OWENS Elise - 3% 24% 45% 24% 4% -
143 QUINN Anna - 5% 31% 43% 18% 3% -
143 SHICK Veronika 3% 22% 41% 28% 5% - -
143 NWODO Naila 1% 14% 44% 33% 8% 1% -
147 SHMUKLER Maria - 3% 21% 46% 25% 5% -
148 BLAKEY Heaven 4% 29% 42% 20% 4% - -
149 OLAWOYE Jadesola 13% 38% 34% 12% 2% - -
150 HAN Mia 1% 27% 49% 20% 3% - -
151 LI Savannah 5% 25% 40% 25% 4% -
152 HO Addison - - 1% 7% 31% 49% 12%
153 SAMALA Reese 6% 40% 41% 12% 1% - -
154 LAVINE Samantha 5% 26% 41% 23% 5% - -
155 BERGMANN Beatrix 40% 49% 10% 1% - - -
156 ANDONIAN Lauren - 9% 35% 39% 15% 2% -
157 HAN Ashley - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8% -
158 COLLINS Anna 1% 41% 43% 14% 2% - -
159 VIJAYAKUMAR Diya 1% 9% 33% 37% 17% 3% -
160 ADLER Zoe 18% 40% 31% 10% 1% - -
161 SWOPE Farren 2% 13% 34% 37% 14% 1% -
162 CHOI Kailyn 2% 12% 33% 35% 15% 3% -
162 MORSE Katherine 2% 46% 39% 11% 1% - -
164 BERTOLINI Mia 10% 33% 37% 17% 3% - -
165 DUVVA Sanika 57% 34% 8% 1% - -
166 WU Lorena 10% 55% 29% 5% - - -
167 LIU Joanna 47% 41% 11% 1% - - -
168 SNYDERS Evelyn 10% 32% 37% 18% 3% - -
169 FECHER Lily 15% 46% 32% 6% - - -
170 KIM Natalie 36% 44% 18% 2% -
171 HARRIS Parker 3% 19% 42% 29% 8% 1%
172 COLE Sofia 16% 40% 33% 10% 1% -
173 SALMI-BYDALEK Ada 36% 46% 16% 2% - -
174 MAGALLANES GABRIELA 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2% -
175 BALIN Julia 33% 43% 20% 4% - - -
176 LEGGETT Emilia 35% 48% 15% 2% - - -
177 DHALIWAL Seerat 6% 51% 35% 8% 1% - -
178 NIRGUDE Esha 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
179 LI Xiang (Shining) 5% 32% 42% 18% 3% - -
179 NAFSOU Ava 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
181 KATS Ekaterina 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
182 VANMOORSEL Faye 7% 31% 42% 17% 3% - -
183 LICHTENSTEIGER Megan 6% 31% 41% 19% 3% - -
183 ALKADI Mai - 21% 46% 27% 5% - -
185 KRONZER Sophia 42% 49% 9% 1% - - -
185 GREEN Marisa 3% 24% 40% 26% 7% -
187 LEMASTERS Elise M. 22% 44% 27% 6% 1% - -
187 LAY Apollonia 6% 30% 38% 20% 5% - -
189 ETIKALA Saanvi 47% 40% 12% 1% - - -
190 HOOGSTRA Lucy 3% 43% 42% 11% 1% - -
191 DESERANNO Seren 8% 43% 38% 10% 1% - -
192 REDEMANN Reagan 77% 22% 1% - - - -
193 XU Teresa 43% 46% 10% 1% - - -
194 WOERTER Therese-Margaret 35% 43% 18% 3% - - -
195 CHOI JULIE 3% 25% 40% 25% 7% 1% -
196 VEIGEL Harper 42% 40% 15% 2% - - -
196 ZOLDAN Nolabelle 37% 46% 15% 2% - - -
198 UHRICH Reese 27% 49% 20% 3% - - -
199 ZHANG Tianyi 35% 46% 17% 2% - - -
200 DIRKES Catherine 3% 28% 46% 20% 3% - -
201 PARK Zena < 1% 4% 22% 39% 27% 6% -
202 CHOI Jordan 66% 29% 4% - - -
203 LIN Kenzie 22% 42% 28% 7% 1% -
204 TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia 26% 45% 24% 5% - - -
205 SHUSTA Lily 6% 33% 44% 15% 2% - -
205 LEE Abigail 29% 48% 20% 3% - - -
205 ACERBI-SAVLOFF Emma 87% 13% 1% - - - -
208 GOLLNICK Mira 3% 20% 37% 28% 10% 2% -
208 GOMEZ Sofia 62% 32% 5% - - - -
208 BHANGOO Paloma 68% 28% 3% - - - -
211 VINS Katherine 83% 16% 1% - - -
212 CHENG Emily 19% 40% 30% 9% 1% - -
212 LEE isabella 11% 37% 37% 14% 2% - -
214 ALVAREZ Isabella 41% 49% 9% 1% - - -
214 KANG Annabella 72% 25% 3% - - - -
214 GENC Sienna 92% 8% - - - - -
214 VIGIL Liliana 74% 23% 2% - - - -
220 CRAWFORD Brynn 95% 5% - - - - -
221 MEITZEN Havah 40% 46% 13% 1% - - -
221 GILLIAM Riley 33% 48% 16% 2% - - -
221 CHENG Emma 40% 50% 9% 1% - - -
221 MCFADDEN Chloe 84% 16% 1% - - - -
225 LEVANT Briea 36% 45% 17% 2% - - -
226 HUANG Veronica 78% 20% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.