Junior Olympics

Junior Women's Foil

Saturday, January 10, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CALISE Ella 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 72%
2 FEDELI Caterina S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 86%
3 CHEN Jia P. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 75%
3 LIU Joy Zhaoyi 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 83%
5 LEE Lavender 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 74%
6 CHO Rebecca H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 82%
7 KIM Rachel 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 51%
8 FENG Grace 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 36%
9 SUN Chloe 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 79%
10 YANG Iris 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 51%
11 DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 68% 20%
12 SHEN Lydia 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 43%
13 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia 100% 100% 99% 86% 44%
14 LI Han (Helina) 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 26%
15 NISSINOFF Alexandra 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 47%
16 PEVZNER Victoria 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 77%
17 JANG Kimberley 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 49%
18 SHIM Grace J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 75% 22%
18 JOO Natalie 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69% 17%
20 SAIFEE Lamya 100% 100% 99% 93% 65% 25% 3%
21 ZOU Ella 100% 100% 100% 95% 71% 27%
22 ORVANANOS Anice 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 33%
23 MI Aileen 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 66%
24 HARRIS Julia 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 43% 6%
25 MANIKTALA Prisha 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 39% 4%
26 GOOR Viviene E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 59%
27 EYER Hailey M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 80%
28 DENG Melissa 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 85% 41%
29 BAE Yooju 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 43% 9%
30 KNAPP Isabella 100% 96% 66% 25% 4% -
31 SUN Emily 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 57% 15%
32 MCSHERRY Ava 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 80% 27%
33 CHEN Renee 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 64%
34 COOPER Piper W. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 71% 12%
35 YANG Emma 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 73%
36 HSU Kaylin 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 70% 22%
36 YANG Audrey 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 80% 28%
38 ZHANG Alina C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 62%
39 SEO IRENE Y. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 44%
40 FENG Audrey 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 54% 6%
41 BING Charlotte 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 34% 2%
42 ZHANG Ivy 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 35% 4%
43 XIE Su 100% 100% 99% 88% 53% 16% 2%
44 FIELD Elizabeth 100% 100% 97% 81% 42% 8% -
44 WANG DINA C. 100% 100% 98% 84% 43% 8% -
44 NEUMANN Erika 100% 99% 84% 48% 15% 2% -
47 ZHOU Joi 100% 100% 96% 74% 28% 4% -
48 SHEN Emilia 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 59%
49 MCFARLANE Asha 100% 100% 99% 89% 57% 19% 2%
50 AYUPOVA AMELIYA 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 9%
51 LIU Ariana 100% 100% 98% 85% 50% 14% 1%
52 LAI Sophia 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 42%
53 LIU Samantha 100% 100% 99% 93% 64% 13%
54 CHEN Chloe I. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69%
55 SHENG Katherine 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 39% 6%
56 TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite 100% 99% 88% 55% 18% 2%
57 MCSHERRY Kayla 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 29% 4%
58 FIELD Julianna 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 67% 11%
59 ZELDIN Nadia 100% 100% 99% 89% 54% 13% 1%
60 CHEN Allison V. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 75%
61 JOO Sara 100% 100% 96% 73% 32% 6% -
62 JACOB Norah 100% 98% 67% 19% 2% -
63 ROZPEDOWSKI Claire 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 71% 23%
64 PEDERSEN Haley 100% 99% 88% 44% 9% 1% -
65 ZHAO Olivia 100% 100% 98% 85% 50% 15% 2%
66 LIU Angel(Daying) 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 48% 11%
67 PARK Lina 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 40% 4%
68 REN Kayley 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 24% 4%
69 VILLARAMA Kara 100% 100% 97% 77% 33% 6% -
70 WANG Amabel 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 34% 5%
71 TAO Ann 100% 99% 92% 65% 28% 5% -
72 KIM Sydney 100% 100% 93% 68% 28% 4%
73 OUYANG Bridgette Z. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 52%
74 DE CASTRO Kai 100% 100% 97% 71% 29% 4% -
75 PEVZNER Nicole 100% 99% 91% 60% 16%
76 BABIAC Julia 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 28%
77 BROWN Lola 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 27% 3%
78 LENK Sophie 100% 100% 100% 98% 80% 36% 3%
79 KIM Claire 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 21% 1%
80 CHAN Ella 100% 100% 98% 80% 39% 8% -
81 CHOW Annabelle 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 38%
82 MEI Sarah 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 34%
83 KRAHE Annika 100% 100% 97% 76% 35% 6% -
84 LI Christina 100% 98% 82% 47% 13% 1% -
85 CHO Karis 100% 98% 85% 50% 14% 1% -
86 SWANSON Alexa 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 49% 11%
87 WANG CAROL 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 39% 5%
88 HAN Katherine 100% 100% 97% 79% 40% 9% -
89 WU Chingfei Amber 100% 100% 99% 90% 58% 14% 1%
90 GUAN Adeline 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 33% 3%
91 MARISI Gianna 100% 100% 100% 93% 63% 19% 2%
92 SHIN Elizabeth 100% 96% 73% 32% 5% -
93 BASSIK Eva 100% 99% 84% 46% 12% 1%
94 ZHU Ella 100% 76% 29% 5% - -
95 CULLIVAN Sienna 100% 92% 59% 19% 2%
96 WANG Joanna 100% 100% 99% 90% 57% 16%
97 BERGEL Daphne 100% 99% 86% 50% 14% 1%
98 MU Allison 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 58% 15%
99 YONG Rosalind 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 21% 3%
100 CAO Kayla 100% 100% 93% 63% 24% 4% -
101 MUMMANENI Samyuta 100% 98% 83% 47% 14% 1%
102 HAFEZ Tahiyah 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 15% 1%
103 LEVESQUE Brielle 100% 100% 98% 81% 38% 6% -
103 WATSON Evelyn 100% 100% 95% 71% 29% 5% -
105 XIE Lillian 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 32% 6%
106 LIU Enjia Sherry liu 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 32% 3%
107 MIYASHIRO Katelyn 100% 100% 97% 83% 46% 9% -
108 HOROWITZ Shuli 100% 100% 97% 74% 32% 5% -
109 ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya 100% 100% 92% 56% 17% 2% -
110 LI Joy 100% 100% 94% 72% 35% 8% -
111 AADHI Hansika 100% 100% 100% 93% 67% 26% 2%
112 LI Katerina 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 13% 2%
113 VO Bao-Vy 100% 100% 99% 92% 62% 19% 2%
114 STRUGAR Steliana 100% 100% 97% 81% 41% 9%
115 DONG Emily 100% 100% 94% 62% 14% 1%
116 ORBE-AUSTIN Nia 100% 87% 47% 11% 1%
117 ZHANG Eunice 100% 100% 99% 87% 53% 13%
118 EPSTEIN Naomi 100% 97% 59% 15% 1% -
119 ZAMLYNNY Maya 100% 99% 88% 51% 15% 2% -
119 EYER Brooke 100% 100% 98% 80% 35% 6% -
121 SHAOOLIAN Maya 100% 97% 74% 33% 6% - -
122 HSIAO Ariya 100% 100% 97% 75% 31% 5% -
123 SHMAY Anastasia 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 33% 4%
124 CHEN Sophie 100% 99% 93% 64% 24% 3% -
125 HSU Rachel 100% 80% 34% 6% - - -
126 KANG Marian 100% 95% 68% 30% 7% 1% -
127 ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. 100% 98% 82% 46% 14% 2% -
128 RIVERA Leahy 100% 99% 83% 38% 8% - -
129 LI Alice 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 20% 1%
130 LIU Ashley 100% 100% 95% 67% 25% 4% -
131 STEWART Isla 100% 65% 14% 1% - - -
132 URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia 100% 99% 92% 61% 21% 3% -
133 PUOPOLO Mia 100% 97% 72% 27% 5% - -
134 ARYA Leela 100% 73% 26% 4% - - -
135 TAN Dorathy 100% 100% 95% 63% 21% 3% -
136 WYNN Kylie 100% 100% 99% 87% 52% 14% 1%
137 HAN Crystal 100% 100% 100% 96% 73% 25% 2%
137 YAO Abby 100% 100% 98% 75% 33% 6% -
139 DIMATULAC Elise Ann 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 30% 4%
140 PHAN Logan 100% 93% 45% 9% 1% - -
141 CHO Olivia 100% 94% 68% 27% 5% - -
142 LUO Miranda 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 30% 3%
143 OWENS Elise 100% 100% 97% 73% 28% 4% -
143 QUINN Anna 100% 100% 95% 64% 21% 3% -
143 SHICK Veronika 100% 97% 75% 34% 6% - -
143 NWODO Naila 100% 99% 85% 41% 9% 1% -
147 SHMUKLER Maria 100% 100% 97% 76% 30% 5% -
148 BLAKEY Heaven 100% 96% 66% 24% 4% - -
149 OLAWOYE Jadesola 100% 87% 48% 14% 2% - -
150 HAN Mia 100% 99% 72% 23% 3% - -
151 LI Savannah 100% 95% 70% 30% 5% -
152 HO Addison 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 61% 12%
153 SAMALA Reese 100% 94% 54% 13% 1% - -
154 LAVINE Samantha 100% 95% 69% 28% 5% - -
155 BERGMANN Beatrix 100% 60% 11% 1% - - -
156 ANDONIAN Lauren 100% 100% 91% 56% 17% 2% -
157 HAN Ashley 100% 100% 95% 74% 36% 8% -
158 COLLINS Anna 100% 99% 58% 15% 2% - -
159 VIJAYAKUMAR Diya 100% 99% 90% 57% 19% 3% -
160 ADLER Zoe 100% 82% 41% 11% 1% - -
161 SWOPE Farren 100% 98% 86% 52% 15% 1% -
162 CHOI Kailyn 100% 98% 86% 53% 18% 3% -
162 MORSE Katherine 100% 98% 52% 13% 1% - -
164 BERTOLINI Mia 100% 90% 57% 20% 3% - -
165 DUVVA Sanika 100% 43% 8% 1% - -
166 WU Lorena 100% 90% 35% 6% - - -
167 LIU Joanna 100% 53% 11% 1% - - -
168 SNYDERS Evelyn 100% 90% 58% 21% 4% - -
169 FECHER Lily 100% 85% 39% 7% - - -
170 KIM Natalie 100% 64% 20% 3% -
171 HARRIS Parker 100% 97% 79% 37% 8% 1%
172 COLE Sofia 100% 84% 44% 12% 1% -
173 SALMI-BYDALEK Ada 100% 64% 18% 2% - -
174 MAGALLANES GABRIELA 100% 98% 84% 51% 17% 2% -
175 BALIN Julia 100% 67% 24% 4% - - -
176 LEGGETT Emilia 100% 65% 18% 2% - - -
177 DHALIWAL Seerat 100% 94% 43% 8% 1% - -
178 NIRGUDE Esha 100% 87% 50% 15% 2% - -
179 LI Xiang (Shining) 100% 95% 64% 22% 3% - -
179 NAFSOU Ava 100% 44% 9% 1% - - -
181 KATS Ekaterina 100% 89% 55% 19% 3% - -
182 VANMOORSEL Faye 100% 93% 62% 19% 3% - -
183 LICHTENSTEIGER Megan 100% 94% 63% 22% 3% - -
183 ALKADI Mai 100% 100% 79% 32% 6% - -
185 KRONZER Sophia 100% 58% 9% 1% - - -
185 GREEN Marisa 100% 97% 73% 33% 7% -
187 LEMASTERS Elise M. 100% 78% 34% 7% 1% - -
187 LAY Apollonia 100% 94% 63% 25% 5% - -
189 ETIKALA Saanvi 100% 53% 13% 1% - - -
190 HOOGSTRA Lucy 100% 97% 54% 12% 1% - -
191 DESERANNO Seren 100% 92% 49% 12% 1% - -
192 REDEMANN Reagan 100% 23% 1% - - - -
193 XU Teresa 100% 57% 10% 1% - - -
194 WOERTER Therese-Margaret 100% 65% 22% 3% - - -
195 CHOI JULIE 100% 97% 72% 32% 7% 1% -
196 VEIGEL Harper 100% 58% 17% 3% - - -
196 ZOLDAN Nolabelle 100% 63% 17% 2% - - -
198 UHRICH Reese 100% 73% 24% 3% - - -
199 ZHANG Tianyi 100% 65% 19% 2% - - -
200 DIRKES Catherine 100% 97% 69% 23% 3% - -
201 PARK Zena 100% 100% 95% 73% 34% 7% -
202 CHOI Jordan 100% 34% 5% - - -
203 LIN Kenzie 100% 78% 36% 8% 1% -
204 TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia 100% 74% 30% 6% - - -
205 SHUSTA Lily 100% 94% 61% 17% 2% - -
205 LEE Abigail 100% 71% 23% 3% - - -
205 ACERBI-SAVLOFF Emma 100% 13% 1% - - - -
208 GOLLNICK Mira 100% 97% 78% 40% 12% 2% -
208 GOMEZ Sofia 100% 38% 6% - - - -
208 BHANGOO Paloma 100% 32% 3% - - - -
211 VINS Katherine 100% 17% 1% - - -
212 CHENG Emily 100% 81% 41% 10% 1% - -
212 LEE isabella 100% 89% 52% 15% 2% - -
214 ALVAREZ Isabella 100% 59% 10% 1% - - -
214 KANG Annabella 100% 28% 3% - - - -
214 GENC Sienna 100% 8% - - - - -
214 VIGIL Liliana 100% 26% 2% - - - -
220 CRAWFORD Brynn 100% 5% - - - - -
221 MEITZEN Havah 100% 60% 14% 1% - - -
221 GILLIAM Riley 100% 67% 18% 2% - - -
221 CHENG Emma 100% 60% 10% 1% - - -
221 MCFADDEN Chloe 100% 16% 1% - - - -
225 LEVANT Briea 100% 64% 19% 2% - - -
226 HUANG Veronica 100% 22% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.