Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YEN Darren | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
| 2 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 3 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
| 3 | LUKASHENKO Darii | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 6 | LILOV NEIL | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 7 | CHAN Daniel | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 8 | LINSKY Matthew | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 9 | SHI Andrew | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 10 | QUAN Nicholas | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 11 | ZU Kevin | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 16% |
| 12 | LAHOTSKA Yahor | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 13 | MORREALE John | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 14 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 15 | LIN William | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 17 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 18 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 19 | PRICE Jack S. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 20 | CHAN Matthew | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 21 | WOOD Elden S. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 22 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 23 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 24 | BARNETT Adam | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 25 | WU Nicholas R. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | VAULES Charles W. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 27 | SAKHAMURI Surya | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 27 | DEWEY Charles J. | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | YEN Preston | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 30 | YUAN Kevin | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | TANG Brendan J. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | LASORSA Matthew | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 34 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 35 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 36 | TAKEMARU Leo | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 37 | MAHONEY Colin M. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 38 | YAO Jonathan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 39 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 39 | GANTA Vijay | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | YANG Richard | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | ZHOU Miles | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 44 | PATTON Colin T. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LI Junyou | 14% | 34% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | HONG Vincent Q. | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | EPSTEIN HENRY N. | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | XU Michael | 8% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 49 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 7% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | GILLIGAN Wolff | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 51 | SANFILIPPO-SCHERER Alexander G. | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | QIN Alexander | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | CHAN Alexander S. | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 54 | CHU Edrick | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | FISK Ethan | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 57 | KOGAN Benjamin | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 58 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 59 | HUANG Ian | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | KEEFE Duncan | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 61 | LEE Jude H. | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | CLAWSON Amzie | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | GOOSMAN Antonio R. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.