Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 2 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 3 | GEFELL Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
| 3 | LUKASHENKO Darii | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 5 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 6 | LILOV NEIL | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 7 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 8 | LINSKY Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 9 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 10 | QUAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 11 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 12 | LAHOTSKA Yahor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 13 | MORREALE John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 14 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 15 | LIN William | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 18 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 19 | PRICE Jack S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 20 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 21 | WOOD Elden S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 22 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 23 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 25 | WU Nicholas R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | VAULES Charles W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 27 | SAKHAMURI Surya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 27 | DEWEY Charles J. | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 30 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | TANG Brendan J. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 34 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 35 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 36 | TAKEMARU Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 37 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 39 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 39 | GANTA Vijay | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | YANG Richard | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | LEVIN Mark A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 44 | PATTON Colin T. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LI Junyou | 100% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 46 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | EPSTEIN HENRY N. | 100% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | XU Michael | 100% | 92% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | GILLIGAN Wolff | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 51 | SANFILIPPO-SCHERER Alexander G. | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | QIN Alexander | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | CHAN Alexander S. | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | CHU Edrick | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 57 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 58 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 59 | HUANG Ian | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | KEEFE Duncan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 61 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | CLAWSON Amzie | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | GOOSMAN Antonio R. | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.