Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | V V V V V D | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
2 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
3 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | V D V D V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
3 | MORREALE John | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
5 | GEFELL Andrew P. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
6 | SAKHAMURI Surya | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
7 | LO Joshua H. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
8 | CHAN Matthew | V D V D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
9 | LASORSA Matthew | V V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
10 | YEN Preston | V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
11 | MAKLIN Edward P. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
12 | YUAN Kevin | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
13 | HONG Vincent Q. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
14 | YANG Richard | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
15 | KOGAN Benjamin | D V V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
16 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | V V V D D | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
17 | CALKINS William H. | V V V V V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
18 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
19 | LINSKY Matthew | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
20 | NOBLE Colin | V V V V D | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
21 | ZHANG Jeffrey | V V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
22 | LEMPERT Levy A. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
23 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
24 | MAHONEY Colin M. | D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
25 | DEWEY Charles J. | D V D V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
26 | LUKASHENKO Darii | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
27 | RAUSCHER Ryan | V V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
28 | HO Kaden M. | D V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
29 | WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. | D V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
30 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | D D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
30 | LEE Justin | V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
32 | LUTHRA Arjun | D D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
33 | DENG Andrew | V D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
34 | HUANG Alexander C. | V D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
35 | CHAN Austin | D D D V V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
36 | GHOSH Tuhin | D V V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
37 | CHENG Kyle | V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
38 | OVERDECK Andrew | D D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
39 | HUANG Ian | D V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
40 | LI Junyou | D V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
41 | CHAN Alexander S. | D V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
42 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | D V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
43 | PANDEY Neil | D V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
44 | SHTEIN Yan | D D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
45 | SANFILIPPO-SCHERER Alexander G. | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
46 | MALONE Gregory D. | D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
46 | HU Andrew | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
48 | HUANG Ethan F. | D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
49 | CHANG Yufeng | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
50 | ZHENG Edward L. | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
51 | HUANG Tyler T. | V D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
52 | GEORGE Daniel | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
53 | GRYCIUK Koby | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
54 | SHI Erick | D V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
55 | ROSEN Ben | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
56 | FISK Ethan | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
57 | CHU Edrick | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
58 | GAJDA Jesse | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.