Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 2 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 3 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 3 | MORREALE John | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
| 5 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 6 | SAKHAMURI Surya | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 7 | LO Joshua H. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 8 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
| 9 | LASORSA Matthew | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 10 | YEN Preston | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | |
| 11 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
| 12 | YUAN Kevin | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
| 13 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | YANG Richard | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
| 15 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 16 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 17 | CALKINS William H. | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 1% | |
| 18 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 6% |
| 19 | LINSKY Matthew | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 20 | NOBLE Colin | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 21 | ZHANG Jeffrey | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | LEMPERT Levy A. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 23 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 24 | MAHONEY Colin M. | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 25 | DEWEY Charles J. | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | LUKASHENKO Darii | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
| 27 | RAUSCHER Ryan | 1% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 28 | HO Kaden M. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 29 | WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 30 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 30 | LEE Justin | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 32 | LUTHRA Arjun | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 33 | DENG Andrew | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 34 | HUANG Alexander C. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | CHAN Austin | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | GHOSH Tuhin | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 37 | CHENG Kyle | 6% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | OVERDECK Andrew | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | HUANG Ian | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 40 | LI Junyou | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | CHAN Alexander S. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 42 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 43 | PANDEY Neil | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | SHTEIN Yan | 3% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 45 | SANFILIPPO-SCHERER Alexander G. | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | MALONE Gregory D. | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 46 | HU Andrew | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | HUANG Ethan F. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 49 | CHANG Yufeng | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | ZHENG Edward L. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 51 | HUANG Tyler T. | 1% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 52 | GEORGE Daniel | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | GRYCIUK Koby | 40% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SHI Erick | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | ROSEN Ben | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | FISK Ethan | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | CHU Edrick | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | GAJDA Jesse | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.