Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | V V D V V | V V V V V | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 2 | HO Brianna W. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 3 | PEVZNER Victoria | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 5 | LUNG Katerina | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 6 | SADAN Jordan E. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 7 | ACHILOVA Feyza | D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 8 | SHAW Kayla M. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 9 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 10 | DAVIA Daniella V. | V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 11 | YE Eileen | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | HUANG NATALIE | V V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 13 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | V D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 14 | TOBIN Brean | D V D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 15 | CHEN Kelly | D V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 16 | SEO IRENE Y. | D D D D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | V V V D V V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 19 | MAK Tinney | V V V V D V | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 | |
| 20 | LI Meilin | D V V D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 21 | CHO Rebecca H. | D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | YU Lauren C. | V V D D V | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 23 | BASSON Bayley D. | D V D V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 24 | PAVE Claire | D D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 25 | XU Madison | V D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 26 | CHEN Allison V. | D D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 27 | GU EMILY | V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | YU Jaime L. | D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 29 | XU Christine | V D V D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 30 | SLASKI Caroline O. | D D D V D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 31 | GARDINER Sophia A. | D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | FURST Chloe | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 33 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | V D D V V | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 | |
| 34 | JONES Jenna | D D V D V V | D | 0.7 | 3 | +2.3 |
| 35 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | D V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 36 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | V V D V D D | D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 37 | WONG Sophia M. | D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 38 | HEISER Anna M. | V V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 39 | MUELLER Tatum J. | D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 40 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | V D D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 41 | ZHANG Alina C. | V D D V D D | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 42 | NICOU Melina | D V D V D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 43 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 44 | LIU Sophia | V D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 45 | GINDE Maithili | D D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 46 | JIN Wendy | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 46 | CHEN Jasmine | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 48 | SIMONOV Dasha | D D D D D D | 3.4 | 0 | -3.4 | |
| 49 | CUNNINGHAM Kelsey | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 50 | LEE Kaitlyn | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 51 | ROHRING Anna L. | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.