Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | - | 6% | 31% | 44% | 18% | |
| 2 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 26% | |
| 3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 3 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 5 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 64% | 14% |
| 6 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 7 | ACHILOVA Feyza | - | 3% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 5% | |
| 8 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 7% | 31% | 43% | 18% | |
| 9 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 10 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
| 11 | YE Eileen | - | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 12 | HUANG NATALIE | 1% | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 13 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 14 | TOBIN Brean | 3% | 35% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 15 | CHEN Kelly | - | - | 4% | 26% | 46% | 23% | |
| 16 | SEO IRENE Y. | 1% | 9% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 17 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% | |
| 18 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 9% | 44% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | MAK Tinney | - | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 79% |
| 20 | LI Meilin | - | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
| 21 | CHO Rebecca H. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% | |
| 22 | YU Lauren C. | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | BASSON Bayley D. | 5% | 27% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | PAVE Claire | - | 8% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 25 | XU Madison | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 26 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 11% | |
| 27 | GU EMILY | - | 8% | 39% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
| 28 | YU Jaime L. | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | XU Christine | - | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 30 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 35% | 45% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | GARDINER Sophia A. | 6% | 57% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 32 | FURST Chloe | 18% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% | |
| 34 | JONES Jenna | 45% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | - | 8% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 36 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% |
| 37 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
| 38 | HEISER Anna M. | 23% | 48% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | MUELLER Tatum J. | - | 15% | 50% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 22% | 57% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 41 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 7% |
| 42 | NICOU Melina | 27% | 52% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 43 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 15% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | LIU Sophia | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 2% | - |
| 45 | GINDE Maithili | 31% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | JIN Wendy | 62% | 34% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | CHEN Jasmine | 53% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | SIMONOV Dasha | < 1% | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 49 | CUNNINGHAM Kelsey | 50% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | LEE Kaitlyn | 88% | 12% | - | - | - | - | |
| 51 | ROHRING Anna L. | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.