Brentwood High School - Brentwood, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHERZAY Ian | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 2 | DENISON Declan | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 38% |
| 3 | MAXU Tiger | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
| 3 | CHEONG Cameron | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | ||
| 5 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% |
| 6 | LEE Mason | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
| 7 | WANG Dylan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 8 | CHARETTE Alex | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% | |
| 9 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 10 | FU Adrian | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 11 | BECK Eli | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 37% | 5% | |
| 12 | YOUNG Luke | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | ||
| 13 | JONES Rodney | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 14 | AUYEUNG Aedan Ho lam | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 15 | WAGY Zeke | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | LIU Nelsun | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 17 | KNIGHT Rollan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% |
| 18 | SHETTY Rohit | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
| 19 | ISAACS Atticus | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 20 | BYRNE Quinlan | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 21 | RAWLINSON Cameron | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | CHANDAK Karan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 23 | PAEK Marcus | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 24 | BISSADA Matthew | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | ||
| 25 | BANGAYAN Anthony | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 22% | |
| 26 | MCKOWN Christopher | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 27 | LY Richard | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | BONTHA Dhruv | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | BAKER Livingston Xander | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 30 | SHAPIRO Benjamin | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | BENITEZ Kevin | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 32 | LICHTENSTEIN Jude | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | JUANG Maximiliano | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
| 34 | ARNALL Laszlo | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 35 | DAI MIKENEVER | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 36 | HOLLY Joseph | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 37 | ARIAS CALIX Franklin | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | CRYSTAL Cole | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | BYUN Matthew | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | GODINA Jayden | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 41 | YOUNG Trevor | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 41 | MARCUS Noah | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
| 43 | ROBINSON Dax | 1% | 4% | 16% | 29% | 30% | 16% | 4% |
| 44 | TORRES A Leonardo | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 45 | GONZALEZ Gonzalo | - | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 46 | CALDWELL Sean | 9% | 28% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | CHEN Alexander | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | KUO Alexander | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 49 | SCHNEIDER Avery | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 50 | LYNG Rylan | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | SERAPIO Jose | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | SCHIEVINK Pritam | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 53 | GONZALEZ Elias | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | ||
| 54 | DONOHUE Angus | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | SPADACCINI Luke | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | DAI Markenever | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 57 | RIVERA Fernando | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 58 | AARONSON JASON | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 59 | SANDOVAL-CUDE Maxwell | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | HORTON Grayson | 5% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 61 | HERNANDEZ Ramon | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | REYES Alejandro | 19% | 44% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | HOU Nathaniel | 13% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.