Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | V V D V V V | V V V V V V | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
2 | TONG ZACHARY | V V V D V | V V V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
3 | GRASS James D. | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
3 | MORRILL Justin | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
5 | NG Jonathan H. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
6 | DENNER Maximilian P. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
7 | NOBLE Colin | V V V D D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
8 | WU Mengke | D V D V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
9 | GINIS Nathan | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
10 | TANG Albert | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
11 | LASORSA Matthew | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
12 | ETIN Ari | V V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
13 | ZHOU Miles | V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
14 | LO Alexander | V V D V V D | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
15 | GHAYALOD ansh | V V D D D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
16 | WONG Ryan | V D V V D D | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
17 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
18 | COLE Alexander | V V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
19 | YUAN Kevin | D V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
20 | BERMAN Luca | V D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
21 | YEN Preston | V V D V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
22 | MENSAH Kennedy C | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
23 | FENG Leo | V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
24 | WANG Andy | D V V V D V | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
25 | ZHENG Edward L. | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
26 | ZHANG Jeffrey | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
27 | MORRILL William | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
28 | HONG Steven | D V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
29 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | D D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
30 | SHOMAN Zachary | D D V D V V | V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
31 | LEDERER Justin W. | D V V V D D | V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
32 | WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. | V D D D V D | V V D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
33 | FIELDS Matthew S. | V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
34 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | V V V V V D | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
35 | STONE Esmond A. | V V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
36 | DENG Andrew | D V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
37 | RAUSCHER Ryan | V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
38 | GOLD Jackson | D V V V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
39 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | V V V D D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
39 | HO Kaden M. | V V D V V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
41 | WU Wilmund | V V V V D D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
42 | CHENG Kyle | D V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
43 | HUANG Tyler T. | V D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
44 | BOURGHOL Matthew | V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
45 | WEBER Mattias A. | V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
46 | LU Caleb Q. | D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
47 | KIM Shaun M. | V V V D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
48 | LUTHRA Arjun | V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
49 | HONG Justin | V V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
50 | KIM Matthew | V V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
51 | ZHOU Brian | D D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
51 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | D V V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
53 | SHAO Peter | V D D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
54 | FISK Ethan | D D D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
55 | OVERDECK Andrew | V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
56 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
57 | SHTEYN Mark | D D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
58 | TRUDNOS Allen | D V D D V D | D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
59 | REN Richard | D V D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
60 | KAPLAN Liam | D D V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
61 | MELIS Gabriele Nathan | D V D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
62 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
63 | HUANG Ethan F. | V V D D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
64 | MOLINARO Lawrence | D D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
65 | TSIGAL Edwin | D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
66 | HAQ Kamran R. | V D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
67 | QIN Alexander | D V D D V | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
68 | BUCCINO George | V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
69 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
70 | PANDEY Neil | V V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
71 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D V D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
72 | LEE Justin | D D V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 | |
73 | OWENS Harrison J. | V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
74 | ZHUANG Rayken | V D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
75 | GEORGE Daniel | D D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
76 | YU Thomas | V D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
76 | GRYCIUK Koby | D D V D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
78 | HAN Daniel Y. | D D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
79 | COSGROVE Connor R. | D V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
80 | EDELMAN Seth A. | V D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
81 | DA GRACA Aidan | D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
82 | DEPEW Spencer | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
83 | VAROQUA Tolby | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
84 | LEMPERT Levy A. | D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
85 | RUDNET Noah | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
86 | DESHETLER Scott | D D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
87 | LEUNG Andrew K. | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
88 | SUSSMAN Jamie | D D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
89 | XUE ALEXANDER | D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
90 | LAMHAOUAR Ryan | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
91 | ZHENG Joshua | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
92 | HUANG Alexander C. | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
92 | TISHININ Alexander D. | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
94 | YURT Vehbi | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
95 | PIWOWAR Alex | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
96 | GILBERT Spencer E. | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
97 | LIN Hadrian | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
98 | MACDERMOTT Rowan | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
99 | ZHANG Yankun | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.