Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Men's Saber

Friday, November 29, 2019 at 12:00 PM

Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. - - - - 2% 28% 70%
2 TONG ZACHARY - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
3 GRASS James D. - 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 3%
3 MORRILL Justin - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
5 NG Jonathan H. - - - 4% 19% 43% 34%
6 DENNER Maximilian P. - 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
7 NOBLE Colin - 4% 15% 31% 32% 16% 2%
8 WU Mengke - 1% 8% 28% 42% 21%
9 GINIS Nathan - - 2% 10% 28% 38% 21%
10 TANG Albert - - 3% 13% 31% 37% 17%
11 LASORSA Matthew - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 18%
12 ETIN Ari - 8% 31% 39% 18% 3%
13 ZHOU Miles - 3% 16% 34% 34% 13%
14 LO Alexander 1% 14% 39% 32% 11% 2% -
15 GHAYALOD ansh - 3% 14% 31% 32% 17% 3%
16 WONG Ryan 1% 11% 27% 33% 21% 6% 1%
17 KIM-COGAN Ryan - 1% 6% 24% 41% 27%
18 COLE Alexander - 1% 10% 30% 36% 19% 4%
19 YUAN Kevin - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
20 BERMAN Luca - - 4% 18% 37% 32% 9%
21 YEN Preston - - - 4% 18% 41% 37%
22 MENSAH Kennedy C - - 4% 21% 45% 30%
23 FENG Leo - 4% 17% 35% 33% 12%
24 WANG Andy 12% 32% 34% 18% 5% 1% -
25 ZHENG Edward L. - 4% 15% 30% 32% 16% 3%
26 ZHANG Jeffrey - 1% 7% 21% 35% 28% 8%
27 MORRILL William - - 3% 16% 35% 34% 12%
28 HONG Steven 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2%
29 NOURELDIN Gabriel - 3% 20% 41% 29% 7%
30 SHOMAN Zachary - - 3% 16% 35% 33% 11%
31 LEDERER Justin W. 7% 26% 34% 23% 8% 1% -
32 WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. - - 3% 14% 31% 36% 16%
33 FIELDS Matthew S. - 1% 10% 31% 40% 18%
34 SHIRPAL Oleksandr - - 1% 7% 29% 51% 13%
35 STONE Esmond A. - 2% 12% 32% 35% 16% 2%
36 DENG Andrew 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
37 RAUSCHER Ryan 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 3%
38 GOLD Jackson 5% 23% 36% 26% 9% 1%
39 CLYMER Lucas Y. - 4% 15% 30% 32% 16% 3%
39 HO Kaden M. - 4% 16% 31% 30% 15% 3%
41 WU Wilmund - - 3% 16% 36% 35% 10%
42 CHENG Kyle - 4% 18% 32% 30% 13% 2%
43 HUANG Tyler T. 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
44 BOURGHOL Matthew - 7% 27% 39% 23% 5%
45 WEBER Mattias A. 1% 14% 38% 34% 12% 1%
46 LU Caleb Q. - 4% 23% 39% 27% 7%
47 KIM Shaun M. - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
48 LUTHRA Arjun 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 9%
49 HONG Justin 8% 46% 35% 10% 1% -
50 KIM Matthew 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 7% 1%
51 ZHOU Brian 1% 8% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
51 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 4% 19% 35% 30% 11% 1% -
53 SHAO Peter - 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
54 FISK Ethan 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 3% -
55 OVERDECK Andrew 15% 37% 32% 13% 2% -
56 BUCHMANN Finn D. 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7%
57 SHTEYN Mark 1% 6% 21% 33% 27% 10% 2%
58 TRUDNOS Allen - - 3% 17% 37% 33% 10%
59 REN Richard 8% 29% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
60 KAPLAN Liam - 5% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
61 MELIS Gabriele Nathan 20% 39% 28% 10% 2% - -
62 EPSTEIN Oliver D. 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
63 HUANG Ethan F. - 1% 6% 22% 38% 27% 6%
64 MOLINARO Lawrence 17% 37% 30% 12% 3% - -
65 TSIGAL Edwin 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1%
66 HAQ Kamran R. 7% 26% 37% 24% 6% 1% -
67 QIN Alexander - 2% 14% 35% 36% 13%
68 BUCCINO George 6% 41% 38% 14% 2% -
69 MCCARTHY Gabriel 1% 11% 36% 37% 14% 2%
70 PANDEY Neil 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% -
71 LIU Mingyang Ryan 33% 41% 21% 5% 1% -
72 LEE Justin 1% 10% 28% 36% 21% 4%
73 OWENS Harrison J. 6% 26% 38% 24% 6% 1%
74 ZHUANG Rayken 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
75 GEORGE Daniel 1% 13% 34% 34% 15% 3% -
76 YU Thomas 6% 25% 36% 25% 7% 1% -
76 GRYCIUK Koby 21% 40% 28% 9% 1% - -
78 HAN Daniel Y. 8% 26% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
79 COSGROVE Connor R. 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
80 EDELMAN Seth A. 1% 9% 26% 34% 22% 7% 1%
81 DA GRACA Aidan 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
82 DEPEW Spencer 6% 35% 39% 16% 3% -
83 VAROQUA Tolby 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% -
84 LEMPERT Levy A. 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6%
85 RUDNET Noah 42% 43% 13% 2% - - -
86 DESHETLER Scott 22% 48% 24% 5% - - -
87 LEUNG Andrew K. 14% 41% 32% 11% 2% - -
88 SUSSMAN Jamie 48% 43% 9% 1% - - -
89 XUE ALEXANDER 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
90 LAMHAOUAR Ryan 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
91 ZHENG Joshua 73% 25% 2% - - -
92 HUANG Alexander C. 1% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
92 TISHININ Alexander D. 2% 13% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
94 YURT Vehbi 70% 27% 3% - - -
95 PIWOWAR Alex 4% 19% 33% 28% 12% 2% -
96 GILBERT Spencer E. 76% 22% 2% - - -
97 LIN Hadrian 39% 43% 15% 3% - - -
98 MACDERMOTT Rowan 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
99 ZHANG Yankun 43% 40% 15% 3% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.