Hills Fencing Institute (H3) - East Northport, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | SHREM Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
| 2 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | |
| 3 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 3 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 5 | LAU LUCAS | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
| 6 | WU Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 8% | |
| 7 | TUNG Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 8 | DATSON David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 9 | XIAO Katelyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 10 | JOYNER Braylon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 16% | 1% | |
| 11 | SALZBERG Austin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 12 | STEVENS Owen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 13 | MELUCCI Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 14 | WAGNER Bennett | 100% | 68% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 15 | BARONE Anthony | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | BUES Caelan | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 17 | PETRIZZO Anna | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 18 | LIU Easun | 100% | 88% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 19 | KHANNA Bhairavi | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 20 | INNOCENZI Luca | 100% | 92% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 21 | KWAAK Braydon | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 22 | DATSON Mia | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.