Canlan Sports Libertyville - Libertyville, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HUYNH Matthew | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | ZHAI Alex | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | SHOU Raymond | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 3 | WU Wallace | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 5 | MURDOCK Koichi | V V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 7 | +1.4 |
| 6 | LI Ryan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 7 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 8 | LI Yunze | D V V V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | HUYNH Kaleb | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 10 | ZHONG Yi | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 11 | PARK Kaiden | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 12 | MCCOOL Henry | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 13 | WANG Mingcheng | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 14 | XU Jason | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 15 | LEE Ryan | V D V V V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 16 | KANAN Noland | V V V D V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 17 | CAO Joshua | V V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 18 | TAN Charlie | V V V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 19 | TEOH Liam | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 20 | ZHONG Tian | V D V V V V | V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 21 | MADDES Gage | V D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 22 | ZHENG Lerui | D V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 23 | TAN Alan | D V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 24 | YU Oliver | V V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 25 | KAJITA Grayson | D V D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 26 | CHAU Ivan | V V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 27 | WILSON Jacob | D V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 28 | TAN Benjamin | V V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 29 | HO Kasper | D V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 30 | SHA Lambor | D V D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 31 | MOON Nolan | D D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 32 | DHALIWAL Zorawar Singh | V V V D D D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 33 | CORAN Roland | V D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 34 | WILLIAMS Thomas | V V V V D D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 35 | AN Jacob | V D V V D V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 36 | SU Aiden | V V V D D V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 37 | KALINA Levi | D V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 38 | LIU Bradley | V D V V D D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 39 | REES Vaughan | V D D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 40 | LALONDE Oscar | D D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 41 | LI Mason | V D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 42 | CHOPEY Oliver | D V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 43 | MENG Andy | D V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 44 | CHANG Joshua | D V V D D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 45 | YUAN Vincent | D V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 46 | ANEN Magnus | V V V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 47 | LIM Cayden | D V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 48 | LI Eric | D D D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 49 | D'MELLO Isaac | D D V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 50 | NETESA Lukian | D V V D D D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 51 | SUN Lucas | V D D V D D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 52 | HWANG Jasper | D D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 53 | WANG Justin | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 54 | HYUN Francis | V D D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 55 | SHAH Aadi | V D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 56 | BROD Baylin | V D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 57 | KLINE Benjamin | V D D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 58 | ZUIDEMA Harrison | D V V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 59 | SAKLESHPUR Shashwat | V V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 60 | MARVEL Elliot | V D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 61 | STEPHAN Tyler | V D D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 62 | ZENG Cayden | V D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 63 | MATIYASH Andrew | V D D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 64 | CHEN Evan | D D D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 65 | NG Harry | D D V D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 66 | PALMERKLEIN Justin | D D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 67 | CHEN Andrew | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 68 | LIN Alex | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 68 | SALMI-BYDALEK Finn | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 70 | MACK Leo | D D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 71 | KRESS Elias | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 72 | AN Graham | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 72 | LINEBERRY KAI | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 74 | LUND Jonah | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 75 | TANG Ethan | D V D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 76 | SUN Zedong Eric | D D D D D D | D | 3.5 | 0 | -3.5 |
| 77 | GUTH Samuel | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 78 | FAN Oscar | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 78 | JENKINS Huxley | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 78 | VALERI Ryan | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 81 | CHAISANGUANTHUM Sarit | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 82 | LANGDON William | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 83 | GULLAPALLI Shrihaan | D D D D D D | D | 3.5 | 0 | -3.5 |
| 84 | VINJE-SHIELDS Harris | D D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 85 | SHEN Hunter | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.