Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
2 | NI Sharon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 40% | 8% | |
3 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
3 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
5 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
6 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
7 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
8 | WEBER Juliana I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
9 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
9 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
11 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
12 | KOO Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
12 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
14 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% | |
15 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
16 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
17 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 45% |
18 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% | |
19 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
20 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
21 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
22 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
23 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
24 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
25 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
26 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
27 | HASSANEIN Toqa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 24% |
28 | OWENS Celine A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% | 3% | |
29 | LU Amy | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
30 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 19% | |
31 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
32 | CHANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
33 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% | 30% | 5% | |
34 | FAY Zoe A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
35 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
36 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
37 | CRUZ Sonia | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
38 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
38 | IQBAL Sulphia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
40 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 97% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | |
41 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 11% | |
42 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 10% | 1% |
43 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
44 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
45 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
46 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
47 | YU Melinda | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
48 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
49 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
50 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
51 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% |
52 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
53 | HESSLER Hope L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - |
54 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
55 | CHEN Xiaohan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
56 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - |
57 | PATNAIK Nastassia | 100% | 99% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
58 | YI Felicia | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
59 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 98% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
60 | MADA Skye | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
61 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 96% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
62 | LIGH Karis | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
63 | REN Xinling | 100% | 94% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
64 | DANK Dina | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
65 | LI Angela | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
66 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 100% | 83% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
67 | HAQ Nylah | 100% | 82% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
68 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 100% | 99% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
69 | DAVIS Jordan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
70 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
71 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
72 | COHEN Charlotte | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
73 | KOTSEN Ava L. | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
74 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
75 | XU JENNY | 100% | 55% | 7% | - | - | - | |
76 | ILYIN Polina | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
77 | HE Xi | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
78 | BHOGAL Sukhleen | 100% | 90% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
79 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
79 | HORMEL Molly | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
81 | SULLIVAN Caroline | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
82 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
83 | YAN Ava | 100% | 84% | 36% | 6% | - | - | |
84 | MESSICK Maya | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
85 | CHARLES Caitlin | 100% | 58% | 7% | - | - | - | |
86 | ZENG Megan | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
86 | FEO ZAKHAROVA Isabella | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
88 | WAIBEL Sophie | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.