Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 2 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 3 | SEO Irene Y. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 3 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 5 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 65% |
| 6 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 39% | |
| 7 | SONG Yuqiao | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 8 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 9% | |
| 9 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 1% | 21% | 48% | 30% | |
| 10 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 1% | 15% | 46% | 38% | |
| 11 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 12% |
| 12 | ZHENG Julie | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | LIN Zhi tong | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 41% | 9% |
| 14 | SHA Yi Ling | - | - | 2% | 18% | 51% | 29% | |
| 15 | MATOS Lívia | - | - | 1% | 24% | 49% | 25% | |
| 16 | ROY Layla | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 17 | WANG Chloe | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% | |
| 18 | NAIR Supriya | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
| 20 | YANG Iris | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 21 | KOKES Gwendolen | - | - | 4% | 28% | 48% | 20% | |
| 22 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | - | 7% | 34% | 44% | 15% | |
| 23 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 24 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 25 | YURKOVA Mariia | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 26 | WANG Jasmine | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 27 | KAPUSTINA Arina | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 38% | 9% | |
| 28 | MI Aileen | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 29 | YAO Ada | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 41% | 12% | |
| 30 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | 4% | 36% | 45% | 15% | |
| 31 | CHOW Annabelle | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 32 | PAULUS Isabella | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | CHAGARES Isabella | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | LEVY Avery | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | CHANG rebecca | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 37 | NULAND Zoe | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | PEVZNER Nicole | 19% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | WEI Angela | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 23% | 50% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | KANDADAI Lara | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | JIANG Claire | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | BERGEL Daphne | 29% | 55% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 45 | PAULUS Sloane | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SMIDA Julia | 5% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | RICHARD Clara | 21% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | ZHOU Sophia | 6% | 33% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | BADLANI Diya | 19% | 45% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 50 | CHEN Thea | 5% | 33% | 54% | 7% | - | - | |
| 50 | KUMAR Ishana | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% | - | |
| 52 | RICHARD Dominique | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 53 | BAIK Madeline | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | KEM Madeleine | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | JIANG Yunyu (Grace) | 11% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | BRANDON Fionnoula | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 57 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 58 | MCSHERRY Emma | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 59 | DEVLIN Xeta | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 60 | CHENG Audrey | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | FORNES Jolie A. | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | HOU Wendong | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 63 | LI Beryl | 42% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 64 | SHEN Emilia | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | WANG Rachael | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 66 | CHEN Renee | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 67 | AO Alyssa | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 68 | TANG Isabella | 20% | 46% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
| 68 | ROSENBERG Danielle | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | YU Bella | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | - | - |
| 71 | ZHANG Ivy | 42% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.