Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
2 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% |
3 | SEO Irene Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
3 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
5 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% |
6 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% | |
7 | SONG Yuqiao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
8 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 9% | |
9 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 30% | |
10 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 38% | |
11 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 12% |
12 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
13 | LIN Zhi tong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 9% |
14 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 29% | |
15 | MATOS Lívia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 74% | 25% | |
16 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
17 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | |
18 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
19 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
20 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
21 | KOKES Gwendolen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 20% | |
22 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 15% | |
23 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
24 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% | |
25 | YURKOVA Mariia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
26 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
27 | KAPUSTINA Arina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% | 9% | |
28 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | |
29 | YAO Ada | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 12% | |
30 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 61% | 15% | |
31 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
32 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
33 | CHAGARES Isabella | 100% | 85% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
34 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
35 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
36 | CHANG rebecca | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
37 | NULAND Zoe | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
38 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
39 | WEI Angela | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
40 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 100% | 77% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
41 | KANDADAI Lara | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
42 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
42 | BERGEL Daphne | 100% | 71% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
45 | PAULUS Sloane | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
46 | SMIDA Julia | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
47 | RICHARD Clara | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
48 | ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 94% | 61% | 13% | 1% | - | |
49 | BADLANI Diya | 100% | 81% | 36% | 5% | - | - | |
50 | CHEN Thea | 100% | 95% | 62% | 7% | - | - | |
50 | KUMAR Ishana | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% | - | |
52 | RICHARD Dominique | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
53 | BAIK Madeline | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
54 | KEM Madeleine | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | |
55 | JIANG Yunyu (Grace) | 100% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |
56 | BRANDON Fionnoula | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
57 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
58 | MCSHERRY Emma | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
59 | DEVLIN Xeta | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | - |
60 | CHENG Audrey | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
61 | FORNES Jolie A. | 100% | 85% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
62 | HOU Wendong | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
63 | LI Beryl | 100% | 58% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
64 | SHEN Emilia | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
65 | WANG Rachael | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
66 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
67 | AO Alyssa | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
68 | TANG Isabella | 100% | 80% | 34% | 5% | - | - | |
68 | ROSENBERG Danielle | 100% | 88% | 52% | 15% | 1% | - | |
70 | YU Bella | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | - | - |
71 | ZHANG Ivy | 100% | 58% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.