Canlan Sports Libertyville - Libertyville, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 2 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 3 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 29% |
| 3 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
| 5 | LIM EUNSEONG | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 6 | YANG David H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 7 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 8 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
| 9 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 10 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 11 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | |
| 12 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% |
| 13 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% |
| 14 | SYMMANK Callen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% | |
| 15 | PARK Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 6% | |
| 16 | WANG Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | YEE Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | |
| 18 | LAM Kirin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 19 | MCGRATH Milo | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | < 1% | |
| 20 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
| 21 | YOU Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% |
| 22 | ZHONG Tian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% |
| 23 | WEBSTER Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 31% | 5% |
| 24 | ZHONG Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 36% | 6% |
| 25 | CHAU Ivan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 14% | 1% |
| 26 | LI Yunze | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | CHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% |
| 28 | XU Rambert | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
| 29 | MURDOCK Koichi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 11% | |
| 30 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 30 | WANG Mingcheng | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 32 | WANG Freyr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 7% |
| 33 | ZHENG Lerui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 23% | |
| 34 | CRONK Trevor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 8% | - |
| 35 | LI Andy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 36 | TAN Alan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 6% | |
| 37 | LI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 26% | |
| 38 | ROBERTSON Liam | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 39 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | WANG kevin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 41 | SHOU Raymond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% | |
| 42 | XU Jason | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | 2% | |
| 43 | DHALIWAL Zorawar Singh | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 44 | MCCOOL Henry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 46 | PAYNE Lynas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 47 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 48 | SHA Lambor | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 49 | JIAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 50 | CORAN Roland | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 51 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 52 | CHAN William | 100% | 92% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | WILSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 54 | UNTEREKER Billy | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | HYUN Francis | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | XIE Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 3% | |
| 57 | NOWICKI William | 100% | 83% | 37% | 6% | - | - | |
| 58 | TEOH Liam | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 59 | MEI Edan | 100% | 83% | 38% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 60 | KAJITA Grayson | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | TEJAKUSUMA Eric | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 62 | ZHANG Hanson | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 3% | |
| 63 | REES Vaughan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 64 | WILLIAMS Thomas | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 65 | SU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 7% | 1% |
| 66 | STAMPS Jasper | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | CROSSETT Peter | 100% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 68 | TAN Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 69 | HAGIWARA-MATIASEK Kazuma | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | MOON Nolan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 71 | LI Eric | 100% | 86% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | NETESA Lukian | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 73 | HWANG Alexander | 100% | 91% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 74 | AN Jacob | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 75 | KOTCH Brodie | 100% | 77% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 76 | WANG Justin | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 77 | MADDES Gage | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 78 | HILDEBRANDT Gerhard | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 79 | CHANG Joshua | 100% | 78% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | LIM Cayden | 100% | 92% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | BODNER Nicholas | 100% | 96% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | NG Gavin | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 83 | LIN Abraham | 100% | 61% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 84 | STEPHAN Tyler | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | LALONDE Oscar | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 86 | LIN Alex | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 86 | TANG Ethan | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | MARVEL Elliot | 100% | 90% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | MATIYASH Andrew | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 90 | KLINE Benjamin | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 91 | VALERI Ryan | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 92 | LUND Jonah | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.