Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Bradley | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 54% | 4% | |
| 2 | ZHANG Raphael | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 38% | 10% |
| 3 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 3 | TOOMRE Kai | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 5 | KOVACS Harrison | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 6 | TANG Royce | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 7 | KARPESHOV Maddox | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 8 | MO Ethan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% | |
| 9 | CHENG Logan | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 10 | WEI JR Shan | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 11 | KROPP Wesley | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 12 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 13 | JIN Andy | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | YAO Ethan | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 15 | KUO Phineas | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 16 | TOPRANI Valmik | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | LIN Wilson | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 18 | LU Hansen | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 19 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 35% | 5% |
| 20 | XU Nathan | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
| 21 | TANG Eric | 2% | 18% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 21 | ZHAO Ryan | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 23 | WANG ZEYU | 1% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | NOVIKOV Yann | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | - | |
| 25 | XIA Philip | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 26 | SEVOSTYANOV Timofey | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.