Wayne State University Matthaei Building - Detroit, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ASHIDA Tomoaki | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 30% | |
| 3 | GATRELL Mitchell | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 48% | 36% |
| 3 | TSAO Lukas | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 49% | 35% |
| 5 | LIU Ethan | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
| 6 | MCISAAC Finn | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 7 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 8 | KANAR Ian | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
| 9 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% |
| 10 | ALLEN Henry | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% |
| 11 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 12 | LEE Ian | - | - | 3% | 20% | 50% | 24% | 3% |
| 13 | HAMILTON Brock | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% |
| 14 | ZHENG Marcus | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% |
| 15 | VANOYEN Dominick | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 42% | 8% |
| 16 | FANG Haoyu | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 43% | 15% | |
| 17 | LU Alex | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 18 | WENGER Liam | 2% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 19 | KUE Temujin | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 27% | 3% |
| 20 | WANG Freyr | 14% | 45% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | TOWNE Benjamin | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | ZHAO Jason | 1% | 9% | 34% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 23 | GNEUHS Sam | - | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | HUNTER Phillip | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 25 | IRVINE Brody | 1% | 10% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 26 | TAGORE Reyansh | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | SANTOS Carlos | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 40% | 13% | |
| 28 | ATKINSON Josiah | - | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 29 | MCGRATH Milo | 17% | 45% | 31% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 30 | TAGORE Ayansh | 65% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 31 | MILLER Bryton | 7% | 30% | 42% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | CHENH Justin | - | 6% | 30% | 44% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ADAM Cristian | 12% | 39% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | ZHU Qihao | 7% | 41% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | VUTUKURI Nikhil Agastya | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | MCGOVERN James | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | CHENG Nathan | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | GYORKE Curran | 34% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | PRYOR Ted | 45% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | DRIVER Atticus | 4% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | GREEN Ethan | 33% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 42 | ROJAS Antonio | 12% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.