Event Results
Longhorn InvitationalDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MENG Zhaoxu | V V V V V V V V | V V V | 4.6 | 8 | +3.4 |
| 2 | VIKEN Natalie | V V V D V V V V | V V D | 6.2 | 7 | +0.8 |
| 3 | DUNN Kathryn | D D V V V D V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | VEJENDLA Pragnya | V D V V D D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | MEDAPATI Tulasi Srilakshmi | V V V V V D D D | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 6 | B Varsha | D D D D V V V D | D | 5.1 | 3 | -2.1 |
| 7 | SEGERSTROM Keely | V D D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 8 | WAPPLEHORST Natalie | D V D D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 9 | WOOD Sofia | D D V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |