Maplewood, NJ - Maplewood, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 6% |
| 2 | GREENE Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | |
| 3 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 3 | LEE Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 5 | SKINNER Graham B. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 6 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% | |
| 7 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 8 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% | |
| 9 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 10 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 8% | |
| 11 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 12 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | |
| 13 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% | |
| 14 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | SULLIVAN Aidan J. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 17 | TASIKAS Stylianos | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 18 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | LEMPERT Adam | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 20 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | KIM Matthew | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | WU Wilmund | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 1% | |
| 24 | LEUNG Andrew K. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 27 | RUIGOMEZ Eduardo | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | OH Triton | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ZHU Shao | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | SMITH Vaughn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | - | |
| 31 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 32 | LIN Stephen | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | BELLUCCI Nicholas | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | YOUNG Sebastian G. | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | DAI William | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | GILPIN Samuel | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.