Event Results
Maximum SABER ChallengeDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHEN Chelsea | V V D V V | V V V V | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 2 | ANDERSON Bradley | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | NOWAKOWSKI Zachary | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | GOSAVI Amiya | V V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 6 | +3.0 |
| 5 | VAN ROY Petra | V V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 6 | CHEN Brian | V D D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 7 | PAN Vivienne | V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 8 | MACCARRA Thomas | D V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 9 | LAN Rory | D D V D V | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 10 | GOURJI Roman | D D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 11 | ZHANG Leon | D V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 12 | GIMELFARB Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 13 | AGGARWAL Keshav | D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |