Maplewood, NJ - Maplewood, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WOODS Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 2 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 3 | CRALEY Thomas M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 3 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 5 | LIU Eric P. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | |
| 6 | DESANDO Michael R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 7 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 13% | |
| 8 | HERGERT Benito | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% |
| 9 | WEINKOPF William O. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 10 | CARMAN Ian K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 13% | |
| 11 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% |
| 12 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
| 13 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | |
| 14 | LIAO Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | LI Yulei | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 16 | VANNI Filippo A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 18 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 20 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 21 | SIEGEL Elliot | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 22 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | SOLIMAN Paul S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | DENYSE Jameson | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 25 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 27 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 28 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | HO Ryan J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 30 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 86% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | SWADDIPONG Diego P. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | BRODERICK Padraig | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | BOOTSMA Shawn-Ryan V. | 100% | 78% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.