Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% |
2 | KEESING Liana | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
3 | CHEN Kelly | - | - | 1% | 13% | 49% | 37% | |
3 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 48% | 36% | |
5 | RENTON Samantha | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
6 | LONG Madeline M. | - | 1% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 9% | |
7 | SCHATZ Erika J. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
8 | GORDON Rachel A. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
9 | LAM Victoria M. | 1% | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
10 | QIAN Zhiyan | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
12 | LABELLE Audreanne | 5% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
13 | ZULUETA Catherine | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 1% |
14 | LIN Emma | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% | - | |
15 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
16 | HERRIES Elsa | 15% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
17 | DATLA Medha | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
18 | DATLA Meha | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
19 | BATRA Savita | 16% | 53% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.